This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2023 October 18. The result of the deletion review was endorse. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. This is unsourced and sources arguably do not exist. I don't see how we can maintain an article that is not OR in these circumstances. On that basis I would accept the argument that V takes precedence over the SNG.
We have been here many times before and when faced with a core policy indicating deletion against an SNG supporting inclusion the answer is always to revisit the the SNG. On that basis the policy based argument is that this is an unsourced article that cannot be sourced. Spartaz Humbug! 05:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:GNG. WP:GEOROAD states "topic notability for county roads... are presumed to be notable if they have been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which contain significant coverage and are reliable and independent of the subject" which there is no evidence of. ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 09:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
23:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Road networks: International road networks (such as the International E-road network), Interstate, national, state and provincial highways- but this does not appear to one of those: our article describes it as a
a short metropolitan routeand Metropolitan Routes in Durban describes it as
intra-city. In this case it appears our guide allows this article to be kept if there is
multiple published secondary sources which contain significant coverage and are reliable and independent of the subject.. My WP:BEFORE has shown me that there is none to be found Even Google maps does not seem to recognize the road as significant. Ping me if anyone can come up with RS and I will change my ivote. Lightburst ( talk) 15:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Just needs to be expanded a little bit with more reference- References don't exist, if you find any, perhaps add them.
there's plenty of articles on Wikipedia, similar to this article- see WP:OTHERSTUFF. ––– GMH MELBOURNE 22:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Just needs to be expanded a little bit with more references.. But there are none to be found, if they WP:NEXIST the participants here, and myself, are unable to find them. Most of the other keeps here come from the belief that this intra-city route has automatic notability based on our guideline, but I believe that it does not. From your rationale you believe it can be expanded with sources, but it cannot because they do not exist. Lightburst ( talk) 00:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2023 October 18. The result of the deletion review was endorse. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. This is unsourced and sources arguably do not exist. I don't see how we can maintain an article that is not OR in these circumstances. On that basis I would accept the argument that V takes precedence over the SNG.
We have been here many times before and when faced with a core policy indicating deletion against an SNG supporting inclusion the answer is always to revisit the the SNG. On that basis the policy based argument is that this is an unsourced article that cannot be sourced. Spartaz Humbug! 05:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:GNG. WP:GEOROAD states "topic notability for county roads... are presumed to be notable if they have been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which contain significant coverage and are reliable and independent of the subject" which there is no evidence of. ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 09:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
23:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Road networks: International road networks (such as the International E-road network), Interstate, national, state and provincial highways- but this does not appear to one of those: our article describes it as a
a short metropolitan routeand Metropolitan Routes in Durban describes it as
intra-city. In this case it appears our guide allows this article to be kept if there is
multiple published secondary sources which contain significant coverage and are reliable and independent of the subject.. My WP:BEFORE has shown me that there is none to be found Even Google maps does not seem to recognize the road as significant. Ping me if anyone can come up with RS and I will change my ivote. Lightburst ( talk) 15:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Just needs to be expanded a little bit with more reference- References don't exist, if you find any, perhaps add them.
there's plenty of articles on Wikipedia, similar to this article- see WP:OTHERSTUFF. ––– GMH MELBOURNE 22:59, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Just needs to be expanded a little bit with more references.. But there are none to be found, if they WP:NEXIST the participants here, and myself, are unable to find them. Most of the other keeps here come from the belief that this intra-city route has automatic notability based on our guideline, but I believe that it does not. From your rationale you believe it can be expanded with sources, but it cannot because they do not exist. Lightburst ( talk) 00:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC)