- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 16:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
M. Nasir
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- M. Nasir ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails Notablity, seems Promotinol or advertising. Sturdyankit (chat) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - I disagree with your proposal to delete this article. This subject is notable as there are sources provided. We can cleanup this by removing any contents that is promotional or advertising. Also we should added more references to prove notablity as well. Best Regards.– Fandi89 ( talk) 00:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Fandi89. – robertsky ( talk) 02:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Fandi89. Anumengelamun ( talk)
- I cann't understand on what basis you guys are putting KEEP votes...your votes are Baseless...give some appropriate reasons if you think this Article is notable enough for English wikipedia...kindly look once the article, How can it seems notable...There is no any valid reference; the provided reference is from Facebook, originals(Black hat seo site) and 3 of 5 reference are from same source.
Sturdyankit
(chat) 01:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- @ Sturdyankit: which sites are black hat seo sites? care to break these down for us? From the way I am seeing the references:
- 1. http://praharaseni.blogspot.my/2001/11/phoenix-bangkit-back-to-roots.html seems to be a republishing of an article from a magazine published in Malaysia. We probably will have to do better and find an alt source/link for this.
- 2. https://www.facebook.com/pages/category/Artist/mnasirofficial/about/ this is his official page. the fact and refs fits WP:ABOUTSELF
- 3. http://www.bfm.my/wavelength-the-journeyman-m-nasir.html http://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/entertainment/m-nasir-traditional-music-meets-western-sounds https://web.archive.org/web/20150809191455/http://www.star2.com/culture/arts/2015/04/29/m-nasir-he-sings-he-writes-now-hes-making-art/ https://web.archive.org/web/20170205181402/http://ww1.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=1998&dt=0813&pub=utusan_malaysia&sec=rencana&pg=ot_04.htm&arc=hive https://web.archive.org/web/20111119041154/http://ecentral.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2011%2F11%2F18%2Fmovies%2F9925532&sec=movies are/were domains belonging reputable media companies based in Malaysia and Singapore.
- 4. http://www.istiadat.gov.my/index.php/component/semakanlantikanskp/ goes Malaysia's government site listing the awards given at national level.
- Pray tell, how are these references invalid? – robertsky ( talk) 01:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- I cann't understand on what basis you guys are putting KEEP votes...your votes are Baseless...give some appropriate reasons if you think this Article is notable enough for English wikipedia...kindly look once the article, How can it seems notable...There is no any valid reference; the provided reference is from Facebook, originals(Black hat seo site) and 3 of 5 reference are from same source.
Sturdyankit
(chat) 01:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as has won a number of notable awards as shown in the article and also has reliable sources coverage such as The Straits Times so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 ( talk) 00:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 16:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
M. Nasir
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- M. Nasir ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails Notablity, seems Promotinol or advertising. Sturdyankit (chat) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 08:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - I disagree with your proposal to delete this article. This subject is notable as there are sources provided. We can cleanup this by removing any contents that is promotional or advertising. Also we should added more references to prove notablity as well. Best Regards.– Fandi89 ( talk) 00:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Fandi89. – robertsky ( talk) 02:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep per Fandi89. Anumengelamun ( talk)
- I cann't understand on what basis you guys are putting KEEP votes...your votes are Baseless...give some appropriate reasons if you think this Article is notable enough for English wikipedia...kindly look once the article, How can it seems notable...There is no any valid reference; the provided reference is from Facebook, originals(Black hat seo site) and 3 of 5 reference are from same source.
Sturdyankit
(chat) 01:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- @ Sturdyankit: which sites are black hat seo sites? care to break these down for us? From the way I am seeing the references:
- 1. http://praharaseni.blogspot.my/2001/11/phoenix-bangkit-back-to-roots.html seems to be a republishing of an article from a magazine published in Malaysia. We probably will have to do better and find an alt source/link for this.
- 2. https://www.facebook.com/pages/category/Artist/mnasirofficial/about/ this is his official page. the fact and refs fits WP:ABOUTSELF
- 3. http://www.bfm.my/wavelength-the-journeyman-m-nasir.html http://www.straitstimes.com/lifestyle/entertainment/m-nasir-traditional-music-meets-western-sounds https://web.archive.org/web/20150809191455/http://www.star2.com/culture/arts/2015/04/29/m-nasir-he-sings-he-writes-now-hes-making-art/ https://web.archive.org/web/20170205181402/http://ww1.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=1998&dt=0813&pub=utusan_malaysia&sec=rencana&pg=ot_04.htm&arc=hive https://web.archive.org/web/20111119041154/http://ecentral.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2011%2F11%2F18%2Fmovies%2F9925532&sec=movies are/were domains belonging reputable media companies based in Malaysia and Singapore.
- 4. http://www.istiadat.gov.my/index.php/component/semakanlantikanskp/ goes Malaysia's government site listing the awards given at national level.
- Pray tell, how are these references invalid? – robertsky ( talk) 01:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- I cann't understand on what basis you guys are putting KEEP votes...your votes are Baseless...give some appropriate reasons if you think this Article is notable enough for English wikipedia...kindly look once the article, How can it seems notable...There is no any valid reference; the provided reference is from Facebook, originals(Black hat seo site) and 3 of 5 reference are from same source.
Sturdyankit
(chat) 01:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as has won a number of notable awards as shown in the article and also has reliable sources coverage such as The Straits Times so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 ( talk) 00:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.