The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 01:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
This nomination genuinely doesn't give me pleasure, as I've tried to save it by a bold merge of Luke Archer (fashion brand) and a rewrite, but ultimately, we have to be blunt - this was originally created as promo/conflict of edit editing by the designer's husband and business partner. Many of the sources are primary or press releases, and there is no evidence that the designer is sufficiently notable on his own merit. I can't find anything remotely reliable beyond a few "former student doing good' pieces on the Middlesex University website. So very sadly, I have to say that this article should be deleted, (although I'd love to see notability proved) and if Luke Archer lives up to his husband's grand claim that it will be a leading luxury brand by 2017, then I'll gladly welcome a new article when the time is right. Mabalu ( talk) 10:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
The result was delete. Courcelles ( talk) 01:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
This nomination genuinely doesn't give me pleasure, as I've tried to save it by a bold merge of Luke Archer (fashion brand) and a rewrite, but ultimately, we have to be blunt - this was originally created as promo/conflict of edit editing by the designer's husband and business partner. Many of the sources are primary or press releases, and there is no evidence that the designer is sufficiently notable on his own merit. I can't find anything remotely reliable beyond a few "former student doing good' pieces on the Middlesex University website. So very sadly, I have to say that this article should be deleted, (although I'd love to see notability proved) and if Luke Archer lives up to his husband's grand claim that it will be a leading luxury brand by 2017, then I'll gladly welcome a new article when the time is right. Mabalu ( talk) 10:59, 9 September 2015 (UTC)