- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 20:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lucy Shtein ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Too small and insignificant Russian politician and activist. Significance according to WP:POLITICS is not observed.-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 20:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Politics, and Russia. Shellwood ( talk) 17:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The article in the Economist (cited on the article) is extended coverage of Shtein. I also find mentions of her in the New York Times, the Guardian, and the Washington Post. DaffodilOcean ( talk) 21:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with DaffodilOcean. Clearly establishes WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk) 04:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Extended significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources already cited in the article at the time of commenting—the Economist, the Guardian, the New York Times—demonstrate fulfillment of
the general notability guideline.
WP:NPOL is a guide for when a person is presumed to be notable, but
people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline
. Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 08:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, subject has been shown to be notable, she has received significant coverage in independent sources. - Samoht27 ( talk) 17:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Let'srun ( talk) 20:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lucy Shtein ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Too small and insignificant Russian politician and activist. Significance according to WP:POLITICS is not observed.-- Анатолий Росдашин ( talk) 20:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Politics, and Russia. Shellwood ( talk) 17:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The article in the Economist (cited on the article) is extended coverage of Shtein. I also find mentions of her in the New York Times, the Guardian, and the Washington Post. DaffodilOcean ( talk) 21:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Agree with DaffodilOcean. Clearly establishes WP:GNG MaskedSinger ( talk) 04:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: Extended significant coverage in multiple reliable independent sources already cited in the article at the time of commenting—the Economist, the Guardian, the New York Times—demonstrate fulfillment of
the general notability guideline.
WP:NPOL is a guide for when a person is presumed to be notable, but
people can still be notable if they meet the general notability guideline
. Hydrangeans ( she/her | talk | edits) 08:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, subject has been shown to be notable, she has received significant coverage in independent sources. - Samoht27 ( talk) 17:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.