The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Draftify: I agree that this article should be draftified. More coverage needs to be sourced from independent, reliable sources to meet the
WP:GNG requirements.
AstridMitch (
talk) 4:40, 19 June 2024
Delete – All coverage to my eye is either not independent of the subject, or is a
WP:TRIVIAL mention. Fails GNG on this basis. My search was unable to turn up sources to prove notability, however they may exist in non-English languages. I am not opposed to incubating should there exist interest in improving the article in that namespace and demonstrating notability either via GNG or
WP:NATHLETE.
Bgv. (
talk)
04:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, no hits on ProQuest and only trivial coverage elsewhere, and it's unlikely there will be SIGCOV in the near future if nothing has come up in the two weeks since her medaling, so I don't see a reason to draftify.
JoelleJay (
talk)
21:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Draftify: I agree that this article should be draftified. More coverage needs to be sourced from independent, reliable sources to meet the
WP:GNG requirements.
AstridMitch (
talk) 4:40, 19 June 2024
Delete – All coverage to my eye is either not independent of the subject, or is a
WP:TRIVIAL mention. Fails GNG on this basis. My search was unable to turn up sources to prove notability, however they may exist in non-English languages. I am not opposed to incubating should there exist interest in improving the article in that namespace and demonstrating notability either via GNG or
WP:NATHLETE.
Bgv. (
talk)
04:50, 19 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete, no hits on ProQuest and only trivial coverage elsewhere, and it's unlikely there will be SIGCOV in the near future if nothing has come up in the two weeks since her medaling, so I don't see a reason to draftify.
JoelleJay (
talk)
21:20, 23 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.