- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 19:14, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Loving, Kentucky ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Rennick's index calls it a locale (geography), but doesn't say anything else about it. Newspapers.com is only bringing up last names for me, while the only Gbooks hit was for a Loving Graveyard, giving directions that seem to lead to the site of the subject of this article. Topos show one home with a graveyard across the road and a church down the road after the graveyard. There's a little more development today, but not a whole lot. I may be wrong, but this seems to be more of an informal rural neighborhood than a legally recognized community. WP:GEOLAND does not seem to be met, and GNG does not seem to be either. Hog Farm Bacon 03:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 03:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 03:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per Nom. The inundation of name only locations, supported only by a GNIS source, fails any and all sourcing requirements to establish notability. This is no more than a dictionary entry. Otr500 ( talk) 15:01, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: As an ATD the article could be merged or redirected to Warren County, Kentucky. Otr500 ( talk) 15:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom, fails GNG and NGEO. per Otr500, Redirects are cheap and harmless, it looks like in Nov 2020 this received 24 views. // Timothy :: talk 02:15, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 15:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 19:14, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Loving, Kentucky ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. Rennick's index calls it a locale (geography), but doesn't say anything else about it. Newspapers.com is only bringing up last names for me, while the only Gbooks hit was for a Loving Graveyard, giving directions that seem to lead to the site of the subject of this article. Topos show one home with a graveyard across the road and a church down the road after the graveyard. There's a little more development today, but not a whole lot. I may be wrong, but this seems to be more of an informal rural neighborhood than a legally recognized community. WP:GEOLAND does not seem to be met, and GNG does not seem to be either. Hog Farm Bacon 03:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 03:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm Bacon 03:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per Nom. The inundation of name only locations, supported only by a GNIS source, fails any and all sourcing requirements to establish notability. This is no more than a dictionary entry. Otr500 ( talk) 15:01, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Note: As an ATD the article could be merged or redirected to Warren County, Kentucky. Otr500 ( talk) 15:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom, fails GNG and NGEO. per Otr500, Redirects are cheap and harmless, it looks like in Nov 2020 this received 24 views. // Timothy :: talk 02:15, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain ( talk) 15:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.