- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR) ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 23:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- Louise Golbey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Very minor music figure in UK. Does not fit any of the criteria listed under Wikipedia:Notability (Music) guidelines and much of information is self-published and/or trivial. Much read like an extended promotional blurb (less than 2000 fans on facebook) Tigerlilygirl ( talk) 17:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 02:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (push) @ 19:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. I am in doubt here. On one hand, there seems to be some notability evidenced by a couple of links, on the other hand, it seems to be borderline, for example, she was once interviewed as a support for a different group.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR) ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 23:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- Louise Golbey ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Very minor music figure in UK. Does not fit any of the criteria listed under Wikipedia:Notability (Music) guidelines and much of information is self-published and/or trivial. Much read like an extended promotional blurb (less than 2000 fans on facebook) Tigerlilygirl ( talk) 17:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 17:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 02:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (push) @ 19:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. I am in doubt here. On one hand, there seems to be some notability evidenced by a couple of links, on the other hand, it seems to be borderline, for example, she was once interviewed as a support for a different group.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 08:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.