The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:20, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I feel like this should be notable, but couldn't find the evidence that it is, in the 3 language WP articles it has or Google. It has been in CAT:NN for 12 years and has a range of other concerns, which may mask a clear assessment of its notability. Boleyn ( talk) 21:23, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 00:20, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I feel like this should be notable, but couldn't find the evidence that it is, in the 3 language WP articles it has or Google. It has been in CAT:NN for 12 years and has a range of other concerns, which may mask a clear assessment of its notability. Boleyn ( talk) 21:23, 16 August 2021 (UTC)