The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The musicians discussed in this article do not meet the criteria for notability in music as outlined in Wikipedia's guidelines. All reliable source coverage listed is local.
WP:BAND and
WP:MUSICBIO criteria are not met. The article is biased, it is written as though it were trying to advertise for or promote the musicians discussed within. The musicians themselves have no strong claim and very little regional/international renown.
InspectorMikeChin (
talk) 04:28, 1 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep There is nothing against such "local" coverage in the guidelines, given that coverage of the quintet is national -
[1][2][3]. Coverage of individual members of the quintet -
[4][5][6][7]. Should qualify under
WP:BAND and
WP:GNG.
Hzh (
talk) 13:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SpartazHumbug! 11:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. Meets
WP:BAND12. Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network. To avoid confusion
WP:MUSICBIO and
WP:BAND are shortcuts to the same notability criteria.
8==8 Boneso (
talk) 00:22, 12 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep as Hzh has identified multiple significant coverage in reliable sources including at the national level that shows that the band passes
WP:NMUSIC as well as
WP:GNG, thanks
Atlantic306 (
talk) 18:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The musicians discussed in this article do not meet the criteria for notability in music as outlined in Wikipedia's guidelines. All reliable source coverage listed is local.
WP:BAND and
WP:MUSICBIO criteria are not met. The article is biased, it is written as though it were trying to advertise for or promote the musicians discussed within. The musicians themselves have no strong claim and very little regional/international renown.
InspectorMikeChin (
talk) 04:28, 1 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep There is nothing against such "local" coverage in the guidelines, given that coverage of the quintet is national -
[1][2][3]. Coverage of individual members of the quintet -
[4][5][6][7]. Should qualify under
WP:BAND and
WP:GNG.
Hzh (
talk) 13:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SpartazHumbug! 11:43, 9 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. Meets
WP:BAND12. Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network. To avoid confusion
WP:MUSICBIO and
WP:BAND are shortcuts to the same notability criteria.
8==8 Boneso (
talk) 00:22, 12 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep as Hzh has identified multiple significant coverage in reliable sources including at the national level that shows that the band passes
WP:NMUSIC as well as
WP:GNG, thanks
Atlantic306 (
talk) 18:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.