- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Looking Glass Workshop
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Looking Glass Workshop ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable art collective and music label which only worked with one notable band. Fails WP:NORG. Mottezen ( talk) 03:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Mottezen ( talk) 03:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Mottezen ( talk) 03:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- delete Still too small and obscure, without major coverage. If they make it big in 2 years, then can get a page. For now no go per WP:N. Ode+Joy ( talk) 12:56, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit 03:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Looking Glass Workshop
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Looking Glass Workshop ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable art collective and music label which only worked with one notable band. Fails WP:NORG. Mottezen ( talk) 03:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Mottezen ( talk) 03:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Mottezen ( talk) 03:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- delete Still too small and obscure, without major coverage. If they make it big in 2 years, then can get a page. For now no go per WP:N. Ode+Joy ( talk) 12:56, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.