The result was: Speedily deleted - no content, duplicates Template:Certainty. - Mike Rosoft 11:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The page is nothing but an article form of {{ certainty}}, and was linked from there. Was tempted to speedy, but decided against. Circeus 03:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep as no support for deletion and nomination is lukewarm. Capitalistroadster 04:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The band in question is sometimes difficult to perform notability searches on, and its popularity has only been weakly asserted in its article. The notability of the band has been argued according to four criteria:
“ | Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable). | ” |
Does the community feel any of these assertions are under-supported or insufficient in proving notability? -- Omicronpersei8 ( talk) 00:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as a {{ db-repost}} of material taken from [2]. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, point 4 refers. (aeropagitica) 00:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Now, I know I said that I hate nominating for AFD right away, but sometimes it's obvious. This page is an obvious violation of WP:NOT a game guide. That's what the page is though. - Royalguard11( Talk· Desk· Review Me!) 00:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. DS 17:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A single server in a minor web-based RPG. This isn't even done for World of Warcraft: Realm (World of Warcraft) lists WOW servers, but doesn't go into any further detail. Zetawoof( ζ) 01:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete. Non-notable film made by college students. It's not even finished yet, according to the article's author. No sources can be found to vouch for it. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 01:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. DS 17:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Questionable notability, no other references to this organisation on the Internet. Cordless Larry 01:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep as a vandal AfD nomination by Railer 654, impersonating an editor of good standing. (aeropagitica) 02:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
We all live through this day on a weekly basis. I find no need for valuable resource space to be wasted here. -- Sango 123 (e) 01:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. DS 18:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
No sources or links for this band. The information may appear to be false. Peter O. ( Talk) 01:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Smells like original research to me -- Xorkl000 02:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Kungfu Adam ( talk) 14:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable, contains information already found in Brahmin. Sfacets 02:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band Missvain 03:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, per WP:V - material that doesn't meet it shouldn't be in one article or another. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 15:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A webmaster of a online "ministry" and author of one self-published book. Arbusto 23:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Also: 1) The leading atheist website www.infidels.org lists 40 Christian apologists and JP Holding is listed among them (see: http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/theism/christianity/apologetics.html)
2) Next, well known Christians have spoken favorably of his ministry (if memory serves Hank Hanegraaff" The Bible answer man" on the radio spoke well of Holding for example). Here is a link to one of Holdings articles at his website: When apologetics was evangelism by JP Holding
3) Many well known atheists disparage Holding and these atheists are listed among Wikipedia subject headings. What better recommendation of your relevance can you get than the public disparagement of those who oppose your viewpoint!
I cite:
G.A. Wells (see: http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/g_a_wells/holding.html )
Farrell Till (see: http://www.theskepticalreview.com/jftill/turkey.html )
Holding returns the disparagement here:
G.A. Wells http://www.tektonics.org/TK-W.html
Farrell Till http://www.tektonics.org/TK-T.html
4) Even the www.infidels.org website has mentioned Holding in rather favorable terms.
I cite:
"Updated the author page of Kyle J. Gerkin with an added link to the "Scholarly Diplomacy Series." (Off Site)
Kyle J. Gerkin and J.P. Holding amicably engage each other in an and ongoing discussion of their differing worldviews. The goal is to tear down the wall of antipathy that too often divides Christians and skeptics, so as to foster a respectful understanding of those differences."
taken from: http://www.infidels.org/secular_web/new/2003/may2003.shtml
5) Holding's website gets a lot off traffic and his articles often get high rankings on the search engines as many people link to them.
6) Holding has been published.
7) I know that many evangelical ministers are aware of Holding. I spoke to one last month and he is aware of Holding.
ken 16:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)kdbuffalo
reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN local politician - crz crztalk 04:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Dakota 03:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN org - crz crztalk 04:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted, CSD-A7. ➨ ЯEDVERS 12:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-Notable band Missvain 04:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted, CSD-A7. ➨ ЯEDVERS 12:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
super non-notable band Missvain 04:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus-- Kungfu Adam ( talk) 14:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Per Talk:Save_Indian_Family#Article_orginally_submitted_as_part_of_MyWikiBiz_paid_PR_blitz, this article was a MyWikiBiz creation. Its tone is that of an advertisement and its sources are unreliable. Durova Charg e! 04:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
-- Landoflakes 13:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This true story in india , so article is must keep it - Vina Ra (vina.raj369@gmail.com
The result was Speedily deleted as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 23:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Article is about a high school athlete with no assertion of noteability beyond local high school activities ElKevbo 05:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Is this notable? It looks to me like promotional material. Any ideas? —— Eagle ( ask me for help) 05:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 01:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable record label Missvain 05:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Birmingham Derby. riana_ dzasta 08:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The exact same article is covered in more detail in Birmingham derby. 'Second City Derby' and 'Birmingham derby' are both the same thing, this page isn't required. I'd merge them, but this contains nothing that isn't already in Birmingham derby. Phileas 05:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article appears to be vanity material according to its history. In particular, please note the userpage content and contributions of Ming Chan ( talk · contribs). Takeel 05:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John Lake 19:16, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Seems to be a non-notable game. Google does not reveal any WP:RS that would indicate that it passes WP:WEB. Leuko 05:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP is not a Soapbox, nor a publisher of original thought. Also was prodded and prod tag was removed with note saying I should explain why the article should be deleted (the prod tag I used said "Is wikipedia a complaint department? I think not.") Bladeswin | Talk to me | 06:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable web game. Does not appear to meet WP:WEB, Google doesn't find any WP:RS. Most of article seems to be a game guide, which WP is not. Leuko 06:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Dakota 03:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
First Deletion Reason: Non-notable film failing the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability (films). Part of the Conspiracy Cruft Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement of The Franklin Coverup Scandal, which was completely discredited 17 years ago and wholely a creature of the blogosphere. A Google News search for the film results in ZERO results. Morton Devonshire Yo 06:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 01:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable computer game. Google does not turn up any WP:RS that indicate that it would pass WP:SOFTWARE. Mostly a game guide, which WP is not. Leuko 06:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep and add to List of songs about AfD's that were closed as Keep. Per Canley's analysis, renomination of poorly devised/maintained indvidual lists should still be ok, but mass deletion doesn't seem to fly. ~ trialsanderrors 02:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Arbitary, unmaintainable, incomplete and therefore useless listcruft. There is a precedent for deleting lists of songs, see here. MER-C 06:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Also nominated is every single list listed here, for the same reasons. MER-C 07:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I've expanded the list as some people have missed it (myself included) -- Steve (Slf67) talk 01:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
List of songs about Birmingham, List of songs about Birmingham, Alabama, List of songs about California, List of songs about Chicago, List of songs about Detroit, List of songs about London, List of songs about Los Angeles, List of songs about Manchester, List of songs about Melbourne, List of songs about New York City, List of songs about Pakistan, List of songs about Ronald Reagan, List of songs about Seattle, List of songs about Sydney, List of songs about Vietnam, List of songs about World War II, List of songs about animals, List of songs about astrology, List of songs about automobiles, List of songs about being alone, List of songs about bipolar disorder, List of songs about childhood, List of songs about children, List of songs about cocaine, List of songs about computer and video games, List of songs about computer games,List of songs about criminals, List of songs about death, List of songs about disasters, List of songs about disease, List of songs about divorce, List of songs about dogs, List of songs about drinking, List of songs about drugs, List of songs about drugs other than heroin, List of songs about environmental pollution, List of songs about famous people, List of songs about famous people (other than politicians), List of songs about fear of death, List of songs about fictitious bands or musicians, List of songs about firearms and weapons, List of songs about friendship, List of songs about hair, List of songs about heroin, List of songs about holidays, List of songs about homosexuality, List of songs about killers, List of songs about marijuana, List of songs about masturbation, List of songs about mental illness, List of songs about money, List of songs about mothers, List of songs about new york, List of songs about new york city, List of songs about nuclear war, List of songs about nyc, List of songs about or referencing Elvis Presley, List of songs about other drugs, List of songs about politicians, List of songs about prostitution, List of songs about racism, List of songs about radio, List of songs about robots, List of songs about school, List of songs about selling out, List of songs about sex, List of songs about sleep, List of songs about suicide, List of songs about tequila, List of songs about the Vietnam War, List of songs about the end of the world, List of songs about the environment, List of songs about the environmental pollution, List of songs about the future, List of songs about the vietnam war, List of songs about video games, List of songs about war, List of songs about weather
*Delete Unsourced and ridiculously subjective.
SteveLamacq43 16:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Patrick1982 18:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
KEEP, the "Songs about Mental Illness" list is excellent and I'm going to use it in my class about popular culture and mental illness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.117.64.3 ( talk • contribs)
The result was keep. Dakota 03:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable computer game. Google does not turn up any WP:RS that indicate that it would pass WP:SOFTWARE. Mostly a game guide, which WP is not. Leuko 06:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 03:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
It's a non-notable shopping centre that I don't think belongs in an encyclopedia. JSmith60 07:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Closure mostly per WP:V, although WP:N concerns were mentioned as well. So article can potentially be recreated with reliable new sources. ~ trialsanderrors 03:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod, removed because they thought they were notable enough to keep. I disagree, I don't think the claims to notability are strong enough. Was a member of several NN bands and was a POW. There were tons of POW's during WWII, being one alone does not make you notable enough for Wikipedia. I don't really see any claims that would have him pass WP:MUSIC. VegaDark 08:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Thank you for your clarification, VegaDark, but I still have to respectfully disagree. I think Pearce's story (and perhaps your own) show a slice of life people of my generation (and beyond) may not see otherwise. JABPP 10:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by Pgk. MER-C 10:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Advert . Article created by user:Meakin who, I assume is the mag's Contributing Editor for fiction, Meakin Armstrong. -- RHaworth 10:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 04:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:WEB for notability, does not cite sources, and appears to be nothing more than an advertisement. Ale_Jrb talk 10:12, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Notice: User:04riversj had edited this page by posting another keep comment, but also by modifying some of the delete opinions expressed above so that they favoured the website instead. Since User:04riversj is a newly created single-purpose account, let us be very clear here to any other user of the website in question who may come visit: abusing this page will not help in saving the article (quite the opposite). Modifying other people's comments is considered vandalism, and when it is done on a deletion debate, it is a most serious form of it. I have reverted said edit (anyone interested may find it here) and posted a final warning on that user's talk page. -- Nehwyn 18:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result wasDelete.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk) 14:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Disputed prod. This is an article on a fan-run game server with no referenced assertion of notability. Suggest deletion as a non-notable original creation per WP:WEB/ WP:NOT. -- Muchness 10:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted, same reasons as first time and DRV that followed. ➨ ЯEDVERS 12:12, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The entire article consists of the single sentence "The Kootenai Valley Press (also known as the Kootenai Valley Times) in a newspaper published in Bonners Ferry, Idaho."
This was previously speedily deleted by user:JzG with the comment "Empty article, devoid of context (and indeed content)". This article is identical to that version, but has one fewer stub template. Thryduulf 11:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted. ➨ ЯEDVERS 12:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A blatant hoax, complete with a Photoshopped picture. GregorB 11:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 15:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Moved from speedy. Appears to be a series of bios, so could possibly be split up but will need to be thoroughly checked for NPOV. Two of the people on the list have articles. Tim! 11:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The Vietnamese Google talks about the events that unfolded in a propaganda style. No mention of the poor South Vietnamese, of the killings and the suicides. Like I said before, this article will eventually include the totality of the month and not just what happened to the soldiers. I do have some articles from the New York Times that can back up some of the contents. The rest about the soldiers, the Pentagon did a debriefing of the South Vietnamese political and military leaders in a series called Vietnam monographs shortly after the fall of Saigon. I will cite the sources and add footnotes and references (these are in storage right now).
http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/specials/saigon/articles.html#surrender http://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%E1%BB%B1_ki%E1%BB%87n_30_th%C3%A1ng_4,_1975
http://www.yale.edu/seas/bibliography/chapters/chap9.html. Several authors (politician/soldiers) recount their hardships and include the names that I included in the article.
Thang Tu means April, Chuyen Buon means Sad/cruel stories. This is a well known poem about the last days.
You are a pain in the ass, but you do have some good points and I do like the suggestions that you made for other articles you are reviewing. I include here the translation of the word, only because you insinuated that I made it up.:} http://vdict.com/bu%E1%BB%93n,2,0.html
The result was keep; given that the nomination and the two initial !votes were regarding a lack of sources (and hence a lack of notability), the five sources which were found counters this. I've added the five references to the article, however they need to be wikified per MOS. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 01:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Seems to be a personalised account. see also Cruel april Tim! 12:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 05:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
It has been pretty much verified that there is no source for this article and that it is a hoax. -- Evertype· ✆ 12:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Questionable notability, no evidence provided to meet WP:BIO. Your notability isn't determined by who you do business with. Unreferenced. Contested prod. MER-C 12:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Meaningless buzzword. Compare the section under "Problems in a business process may arise in three places:" in WP:BOLLOCKS Leibniz 12:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable per WP:BIO. Leibniz 13:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Vanity page for non-notable person. No evidence of satisfying WP:BIO. Valrith 13:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 13:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN per WP:PROF ("an emerging new scholar" says as much). Leibniz 13:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 15:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not meet notability guidelines for music or people.
Mdhandley 13:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Apparent vanity, original research, spam as a business location, no notability and unencyclopedic. Nothing that could not be summed up in the main San Antonio as -San Antonio is home to a number of high tech organiosations, such as **** Nuttah68 14:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. DS 19:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Original research. Deproded by author without explanation. The original article contained the following: "...information about the Guler kingdom that I have obtained first-hand via research, interviews and museum study. As this research project is still in progress, I encourage anybody willing to contribute to the project to contact us." No sources given. eaolson 14:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
original resarch and listcruft. Onknkrpwxq 15:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. W.marsh 01:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
original research and non-notable. Onknkrpwxq 15:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Advert for the "institute", OR/ WP:BOLLOCKS, no WP:RS. Related nominations: Tom Atlee and Co-Intelligence Institute. Leibniz 17:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW and CSD G7 -- pgk 18:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Small IRC "network", we do have articles on various other IRC networks, is this sufficient to keep this on wikipedia. No vote-- pgk 15:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 23:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Evolution of sex per conflicting consensi: 1. the topic seems notable, 2. the article fails our policies, and there is no reason to believe this will change in the near future. Redirecting preserves the edit history, so it can be recreated if someone with the necessary expertise is willing to work on it. ~ trialsanderrors 03:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The page has been listed as POV since May 2005. It has not changed much at all in that time and is still POV. I propose that the page be deleted as it doesn't seem to be going anywhere. This would allow for a nice fresh start to be made if someone felt it was necessary. Localzuk (talk) 15:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I don't see how that applies. My reading is a controversy about sexual or asexual reproduction, without creationist WP:BOLLOCKS. I suggest: speedy keep, take off POV tag, but expert attention needed. Leibniz 19:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep - no other opinions presented, and not even a nominator to give a reason! Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 01:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Prod added by Fr. Wolf ( talk · contribs) with the argument that the article appeared to be created to advertise for the school and that negative or neutral statements were being repeatedly removed. Since I see insufficient evidence of that, I am moving this to AfD but am opining keep. If there is a content problem, it should be dealt as a content problem, not as a deletion. -- Nlu ( talk) 16:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Looks like vanity. Unless notability established, delete. -- Nlu ( talk) 16:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as a copy of non-commercial licensed content. Interiot 17:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Fancruft pasted from a Start Trek-specific wiki. -- Nehwyn 16:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non-encyclopedic, original research essay, instruction manual — Hanuman Das 17:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect as per VegaDark. DS 19:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
An article about a joke, I don't think it needs it's own article. I can only imagine how many articles we would have if we gave every joke in seinfeld an article. I made a post asking for references to notability, but got no response(Only reference is to an Urban dictionary entry written by "the brockman"). HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 17:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 01:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Academic CV; not enough to meet WP:BIO or the proposed WP:PROF. -- Nehwyn 17:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
"Press release" page for NN local wrestling event. Googling "Championship deathlock wrestling" gets exactly 1 ghit, this Bebo user page, "Frontline Euro Wrestling" gets 6 ghits, including a Bebo page, a Wiktionary delele log page, and this WP user page Th. Author took off speedy-delete, no references, and linkless tag twice, without adding links or references. The "notability" of this event appears to be mostly wishful thinking on the part of the author. Delete and salt Tubezone 18:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Nomination: The article was created and almost exlusively maintained by the single-purpose account that created AirSage, and advertisementesque article for a company making this "technology". The technology does not get mentioned in the journals "ITS Journal - Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal"/"Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems" since 2002 (the name changed in 2004), " IEEE Proceedings: Intelligent Transport Systems" in 2006, "IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine" in 2006, or the "IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems" since 2000. It does not appear in the U.S. DOT's National ITS Architecture Version 5.1 (latest, dated 10/20/2005). There is no google hit for "floating cellular data" that doesn't link back to Wikipedia. Accordingly, I nominate this article for deletion as a WP:V violation intended to assist in a WP:CORP violation for the article AirSage (which I am also nominating for deletion). The Literate Engineer 18:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Nomination: I believe that this company fails WP:CORP and is therefore a violation of WP:NOT section 1.4.3. The article was created by what I believe is a single-purpose account promoting the company and its experimental technology, Floating Cellular Data, which also I believe fails WP:CORP and has verifiability issues. The Literate Engineer 18:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per G1, A7, etc. Naconkantari 03:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete due to WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information about your dorm. If true, the information about the four-diamond rating could be at the Hatfield College article at best, but other than that, this contains no encyclopedic information, reads like a magnet for vanity, POV violations, WP:NFT games such as the "A Stairs Challenge" and "A Stairs Pool" mentioned, etc. The author asserts I'm violating his human rights by tagging this with a prod, so AfD seems like a legitimate move. -- Kinu t/ c 18:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is unsourced, contains unverifiable and likely false information about the phenomenon (thousands of rivers flow north in Asia, North Africa, Europe, Canada, Australia, and the Indonesian archipelago), contains unverifiable claims about why the supposed phenomenon exists, and does not assert the notability of the phrase "devil's river". For all the article says, the phrase (and the explanation) could have been created by the article's original writer out of thin air. If "devil's river" really is a commonly used term, the article should say at the very least who uses it, why they use it, and whether the belief is supported by reliable sources (and if so, those sources should be given). Charlene 18:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn by nominator. Zetawoof( ζ) 22:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Withdrawn You can't define main, this is clearly a violation of
WP:NPOV. The "references and notes" section just seems non-encyclopedic to me.
Michaelas10
(Talk) 19:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. W.marsh 01:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non-notable software failing WP:SOFTWARE. Prod removed with incorrect use of Wikipedia articles as establishing notability. ju66l3r 19:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable group, does not meet WP:MUSIC. Repeated speedy deletions just keep resulting in the page getting re-created [8], so moving to AfD to settle the matter. Recommend re-speedy deletion, and page protection -- Elonka 19:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable conspiracy theorist. Appears to have made two videos "9-11 the greatest lie ever sold" and "The GOP - Grand ol Pedophiles" - both helpfully available on Google Video - but looking through the first few pages of google I don't see any hits from outside the walled garden of conspiracy theorists. Nothing on google news either. GabrielF 20:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non notable comic: "Jack and Mark" plus "James Harden" gives zero Google hits, as does "que inc" plus "james harden" and "que inc" plus "jack and mark". Fails WP:V thoroughly. As the article now admits, it is an unreleased school comic by a student, so fails WP:V thoroughly. Fram 20:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
No indication of significance for this theater group. The article does have as sources newpaper pages stating that they have performed, but to me this is not the nontrivial kind of coverage we'd want to have an article about this. Author's explanation of the notability of this group is "I believe an article is required as it an Irish Theatre group and contributes to Irish Theatre in general." However, there's nothing magical about Irish theatre groups that gives them automatic significance. As far as I can tell, this is what we'd call a "community theater" here- every town has several of these but they aren't generally significant. Friday (talk) 20:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This convention has no claim to notability. It had only roughly 1,000 attendees last year. It is copy of an article from wikifur, a wiki which by consensus is considered non notable. [9] [10] [11] BigE1977 20:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was redirected to hermit crab, with a link to Wikibooks added. DS 19:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A how-to guide on hermit crab care. Merge has been proposed, but pretty much all the encyclopedic information is already in Hermit crab and the entry on Wikibooks for this is far better already. Most of the info is simply a price guide or silly advice (do not shake crab). Delete as Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. Wickethewok 20:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Looking at the amount of edits being made to it, I realised this isn't even worth an AfD. JD talk 20:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The article is based on the hoax by IGN.com, and even IGN has already officially announced it as a hoax. Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント ( talk) 20:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Might have gone differently if nominator supplied a reason. — CharlotteWebb 08:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Nominated by an IP editor without completing the AfD listing. Abstain. GTBacchus( talk) 20:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per CSD G4. JD talk 20:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Unencylopedic, pointless. Delete per Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. GTBacchus( talk) 20:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Performed a Google search for ""Dragon Vomit" cocktail", no hits. Then just "Dragon Vomit", no drinks-related hits. Also performed search on the apparently related drink "Buffalo Runs", again no hits. I think this exists only as an idea in the author's mind. Gekedo 21:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Everyone should try it at least once. Saltandlite 21:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article has been deleted five times under WP:PROD or WP:CSD. I'm nominating it mainly to settle the issue, as people are edit-warring about whether to remove the PROD tags that have once again accumulated (no, this doesn't make sense to me, either).
I'm not really sure whether we should just delete this or try and clean it up. On one hand, the guy has a surprising amount of press coverage about whatever it is he does (see this older version), but on the other hand, none of it seems to indicate substantial notability under WP:BIO. More to the point, it still reads like an advertisement in this last incarnation, and judging from the history, it would need someone really perseverant to try and make this into an encyclopedic biographical article. Sandstein 21:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by NCurse as an empty article. Zetawoof( ζ) 16:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article contains no real information. — Markles 21:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted by Xoloz: "A7/G11". Zetawoof( ζ) 19:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A Google search for this website yields only the site itself, and the name of several profiles at various social networking sites. Fails WP:CORP because I can't find any external information on the company. Also fails WP:WEB: see here and here. In addition, the text for the article was copied from the website of the organization/service. Also, nothing is on the talk page (despite the {{ hangon}}), and the speedy delete was removed by the creator of the page. I can't even tell what the site is about, Piracy? Gracenotes T § 21:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was merge and redirect to Procfs. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 05:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Doc aberdeen 09:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep all except the reissue, and I wonder if "The Heartless Control Everything" is a song about Wikipedia? ~ trialsanderrors 05:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Looks like this band may have notability issues per WP:MUSIC. Not being a music expert, I thought it'd be best to let the Human League Of Distinguished Music Knowledgable Editors discuss them. No vote from me. Tubezone 22:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Idk if this is the official artical about the band, but they were featured in AP the magazine alternativepress.com they are amazing and they should seriously be taken seriously. They are amazing.
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This looks like an excuse to link Wikipedia to some videos of someone swearing rather than an attempt to contribute encyclopedically. This person is hardly notable and the tone is hardly NPOV. Seems we would be better without the article - especially as the links to the swearing have been removed for copyright reasons. Spartaz 22:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. DS 22:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I knew someone would try to post an article on this entity since I saw the (self-proclaimed) "chairman" announce it on the RevolutionaryLeft.com message boards. Entirely non-notable, no evidence of real-world existence, no sources. — Sesel 22:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete per WP:BIO/ WP:MUSIC. -- Core desat 04:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Not only is this page painfully POV in its eulogy, with quotes such as "He would have been champ for the entire seven weeks", and "the New York Police picked him up for being in the wrong place at the wrong time", but the subject of the article would appear to be non-notable. "Twilight rapper" gets a grand total of 2 Google hits, while his nickname "Tha Futcha" gets only 140, a large whack of which would appear to be Myspace. Basically, being a contestant on a couple of radio shows does not give sufficient notability for a reputable encyclopedia. Moreschi 22:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Yall can say whatever yall want, this is not going away. This is not going away. Word up. - A Different World - Tuesday, November 14, 2006. 7:45 P.M. (Happy Birthday Obie Trice, Ja Rule Hater)
I'm telling yall, if theres no more corrections to be made, then I'm going to get rid of the grey thing that's on top. - A Different World - Tuesday, November 14, 2006. 7:49 P.M.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Rumored team, Wikipedia is not the place to start or spread rumours ( WP:NOT crystal ball). Punkmorten 22:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article was previously deleted here. I maintain that this is a non-notable webcomic, I doubt it has been reviewed by reliable third party sources. I have also contacted the admin who undeleted the article here about my concerns for the article. But I really do not think it can be saved. - Hahnch e n 01:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 06:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
See first AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolution music canada
This article was created in October 2006 and incorrectly tagged as reposted AfD content, for which I deleted it. It has since been pointed out that the article was not a direct repost of the deleted content, so I have recreated it.
However, I do believe that it fails Wikiepdia's notability rules. It does not verify any of its claims of notability, nor does it provide any external sources which suggest that it has had the impact it claims.
I'm not aware of any precedent about record labels - they're not mentioned at WP:MUSIC - and I thought that the best thing to do now would be to put this to a community discussion. Robdurbar 08:09, 6 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consencus to delete, aka merge, also known as "keep" in some states. - 152.91.9.144 06:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, proprietary product, little if any support from third party developers. Topic should be covered by non-company-specific technology page such as Event Stream Processing, etc. Ronnotel 17:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The entry could be improved and certainly it is lacking references. It might make sense to merge this entry with the one on K (programming language). The K and KDB are tightly linked: KDB is developed in K and K itself is little used outside of KDB applications.
I do use both K and KDB and I am a fan of both, but I have no association with either Kx Systems or First Derivatives. Some of the points mentioned above might be difficult to document and I wouldn't include them in the actual entry. They are nonetheless true; I think anyone in the financial industry who deals with trade and quote data would find them uncontroversial. -- Abcarter 18:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 04:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Nonnotable Internet essay that has few links. –- kungming· 2 | (Talk· Contact) 23:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. See also prior AfD. ~ trialsanderrors 06:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article has two inherent, uncorrectable problems.
So, for these two reasons, the article and the list should be deleted. (I would also advocate deleting the Republican equivalent of this page, in case people wonder about my political leanings.) George J. Bendo 23:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all. References have not been forthcoming; if someone believes this is notable enough and wishes to write a referenced article about this game, they are welcome to do so, but my feeling is the articles in their current totally unsourced state is not something they will be able to expand upon. Better rewrite from scratch, citing sources. Kimchi. sg 11:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable web game with a slew of crufty related articles. Danny Lilithborne 23:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 00:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
(Included in this AfD is the article Countdown to Destruction (album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)).
The subject does not meet the criteria of WP:BAND. They do not show up on Allmusic, and the previous name, Out of Step, is the name of a blues band with 1 album. A Google search for "Hold up Your End"+Brantford shows 57 results (12 unique). A search for "Hold Up Your End"+"Countdown to Destruction" shows 2 results. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 23:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus. This should probably be renominated in due time if it isn't cleaned up anytime soon. ~ trialsanderrors 07:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Page created by self-professed organizer of the event. Numerous POV/advert/style problems resulting from autobio nature of the article. Limited notability (under 1000 Ghits for the festival name and all sponsoring groups or self-references). ju66l3r 23:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
One-sentence stub about a non-notable group. I put a speedy tag on it and User:Stifle removed it and said "I think working to eliminate child labour is notable". Crabapplecove 00:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was: Speedily deleted - no content, duplicates Template:Certainty. - Mike Rosoft 11:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The page is nothing but an article form of {{ certainty}}, and was linked from there. Was tempted to speedy, but decided against. Circeus 03:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep as no support for deletion and nomination is lukewarm. Capitalistroadster 04:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The band in question is sometimes difficult to perform notability searches on, and its popularity has only been weakly asserted in its article. The notability of the band has been argued according to four criteria:
“ | Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable). | ” |
Does the community feel any of these assertions are under-supported or insufficient in proving notability? -- Omicronpersei8 ( talk) 00:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as a {{ db-repost}} of material taken from [2]. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, point 4 refers. (aeropagitica) 00:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Now, I know I said that I hate nominating for AFD right away, but sometimes it's obvious. This page is an obvious violation of WP:NOT a game guide. That's what the page is though. - Royalguard11( Talk· Desk· Review Me!) 00:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. DS 17:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A single server in a minor web-based RPG. This isn't even done for World of Warcraft: Realm (World of Warcraft) lists WOW servers, but doesn't go into any further detail. Zetawoof( ζ) 01:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete. Non-notable film made by college students. It's not even finished yet, according to the article's author. No sources can be found to vouch for it. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 01:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. DS 17:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Questionable notability, no other references to this organisation on the Internet. Cordless Larry 01:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy keep as a vandal AfD nomination by Railer 654, impersonating an editor of good standing. (aeropagitica) 02:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
We all live through this day on a weekly basis. I find no need for valuable resource space to be wasted here. -- Sango 123 (e) 01:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. DS 18:01, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
No sources or links for this band. The information may appear to be false. Peter O. ( Talk) 01:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Smells like original research to me -- Xorkl000 02:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Kungfu Adam ( talk) 14:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non notable, contains information already found in Brahmin. Sfacets 02:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable band Missvain 03:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete, per WP:V - material that doesn't meet it shouldn't be in one article or another. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 15:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A webmaster of a online "ministry" and author of one self-published book. Arbusto 23:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Also: 1) The leading atheist website www.infidels.org lists 40 Christian apologists and JP Holding is listed among them (see: http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/theism/christianity/apologetics.html)
2) Next, well known Christians have spoken favorably of his ministry (if memory serves Hank Hanegraaff" The Bible answer man" on the radio spoke well of Holding for example). Here is a link to one of Holdings articles at his website: When apologetics was evangelism by JP Holding
3) Many well known atheists disparage Holding and these atheists are listed among Wikipedia subject headings. What better recommendation of your relevance can you get than the public disparagement of those who oppose your viewpoint!
I cite:
G.A. Wells (see: http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/g_a_wells/holding.html )
Farrell Till (see: http://www.theskepticalreview.com/jftill/turkey.html )
Holding returns the disparagement here:
G.A. Wells http://www.tektonics.org/TK-W.html
Farrell Till http://www.tektonics.org/TK-T.html
4) Even the www.infidels.org website has mentioned Holding in rather favorable terms.
I cite:
"Updated the author page of Kyle J. Gerkin with an added link to the "Scholarly Diplomacy Series." (Off Site)
Kyle J. Gerkin and J.P. Holding amicably engage each other in an and ongoing discussion of their differing worldviews. The goal is to tear down the wall of antipathy that too often divides Christians and skeptics, so as to foster a respectful understanding of those differences."
taken from: http://www.infidels.org/secular_web/new/2003/may2003.shtml
5) Holding's website gets a lot off traffic and his articles often get high rankings on the search engines as many people link to them.
6) Holding has been published.
7) I know that many evangelical ministers are aware of Holding. I spoke to one last month and he is aware of Holding.
ken 16:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)kdbuffalo
reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN local politician - crz crztalk 04:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Dakota 03:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN org - crz crztalk 04:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted, CSD-A7. ➨ ЯEDVERS 12:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-Notable band Missvain 04:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted, CSD-A7. ➨ ЯEDVERS 12:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
super non-notable band Missvain 04:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus-- Kungfu Adam ( talk) 14:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Per Talk:Save_Indian_Family#Article_orginally_submitted_as_part_of_MyWikiBiz_paid_PR_blitz, this article was a MyWikiBiz creation. Its tone is that of an advertisement and its sources are unreliable. Durova Charg e! 04:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
-- Landoflakes 13:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This true story in india , so article is must keep it - Vina Ra (vina.raj369@gmail.com
The result was Speedily deleted as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 23:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Article is about a high school athlete with no assertion of noteability beyond local high school activities ElKevbo 05:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Is this notable? It looks to me like promotional material. Any ideas? —— Eagle ( ask me for help) 05:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 01:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable record label Missvain 05:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Birmingham Derby. riana_ dzasta 08:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The exact same article is covered in more detail in Birmingham derby. 'Second City Derby' and 'Birmingham derby' are both the same thing, this page isn't required. I'd merge them, but this contains nothing that isn't already in Birmingham derby. Phileas 05:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article appears to be vanity material according to its history. In particular, please note the userpage content and contributions of Ming Chan ( talk · contribs). Takeel 05:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. John Lake 19:16, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Seems to be a non-notable game. Google does not reveal any WP:RS that would indicate that it passes WP:WEB. Leuko 05:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
WP is not a Soapbox, nor a publisher of original thought. Also was prodded and prod tag was removed with note saying I should explain why the article should be deleted (the prod tag I used said "Is wikipedia a complaint department? I think not.") Bladeswin | Talk to me | 06:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 01:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable web game. Does not appear to meet WP:WEB, Google doesn't find any WP:RS. Most of article seems to be a game guide, which WP is not. Leuko 06:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Dakota 03:28, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
First Deletion Reason: Non-notable film failing the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability (films). Part of the Conspiracy Cruft Wikipedia:Vanispamcruftisement of The Franklin Coverup Scandal, which was completely discredited 17 years ago and wholely a creature of the blogosphere. A Google News search for the film results in ZERO results. Morton Devonshire Yo 06:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 01:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable computer game. Google does not turn up any WP:RS that indicate that it would pass WP:SOFTWARE. Mostly a game guide, which WP is not. Leuko 06:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep and add to List of songs about AfD's that were closed as Keep. Per Canley's analysis, renomination of poorly devised/maintained indvidual lists should still be ok, but mass deletion doesn't seem to fly. ~ trialsanderrors 02:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Arbitary, unmaintainable, incomplete and therefore useless listcruft. There is a precedent for deleting lists of songs, see here. MER-C 06:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Also nominated is every single list listed here, for the same reasons. MER-C 07:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I've expanded the list as some people have missed it (myself included) -- Steve (Slf67) talk 01:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
List of songs about Birmingham, List of songs about Birmingham, Alabama, List of songs about California, List of songs about Chicago, List of songs about Detroit, List of songs about London, List of songs about Los Angeles, List of songs about Manchester, List of songs about Melbourne, List of songs about New York City, List of songs about Pakistan, List of songs about Ronald Reagan, List of songs about Seattle, List of songs about Sydney, List of songs about Vietnam, List of songs about World War II, List of songs about animals, List of songs about astrology, List of songs about automobiles, List of songs about being alone, List of songs about bipolar disorder, List of songs about childhood, List of songs about children, List of songs about cocaine, List of songs about computer and video games, List of songs about computer games,List of songs about criminals, List of songs about death, List of songs about disasters, List of songs about disease, List of songs about divorce, List of songs about dogs, List of songs about drinking, List of songs about drugs, List of songs about drugs other than heroin, List of songs about environmental pollution, List of songs about famous people, List of songs about famous people (other than politicians), List of songs about fear of death, List of songs about fictitious bands or musicians, List of songs about firearms and weapons, List of songs about friendship, List of songs about hair, List of songs about heroin, List of songs about holidays, List of songs about homosexuality, List of songs about killers, List of songs about marijuana, List of songs about masturbation, List of songs about mental illness, List of songs about money, List of songs about mothers, List of songs about new york, List of songs about new york city, List of songs about nuclear war, List of songs about nyc, List of songs about or referencing Elvis Presley, List of songs about other drugs, List of songs about politicians, List of songs about prostitution, List of songs about racism, List of songs about radio, List of songs about robots, List of songs about school, List of songs about selling out, List of songs about sex, List of songs about sleep, List of songs about suicide, List of songs about tequila, List of songs about the Vietnam War, List of songs about the end of the world, List of songs about the environment, List of songs about the environmental pollution, List of songs about the future, List of songs about the vietnam war, List of songs about video games, List of songs about war, List of songs about weather
*Delete Unsourced and ridiculously subjective.
SteveLamacq43 16:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Patrick1982 18:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
KEEP, the "Songs about Mental Illness" list is excellent and I'm going to use it in my class about popular culture and mental illness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.117.64.3 ( talk • contribs)
The result was keep. Dakota 03:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable computer game. Google does not turn up any WP:RS that indicate that it would pass WP:SOFTWARE. Mostly a game guide, which WP is not. Leuko 06:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 03:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
It's a non-notable shopping centre that I don't think belongs in an encyclopedia. JSmith60 07:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Closure mostly per WP:V, although WP:N concerns were mentioned as well. So article can potentially be recreated with reliable new sources. ~ trialsanderrors 03:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod, removed because they thought they were notable enough to keep. I disagree, I don't think the claims to notability are strong enough. Was a member of several NN bands and was a POW. There were tons of POW's during WWII, being one alone does not make you notable enough for Wikipedia. I don't really see any claims that would have him pass WP:MUSIC. VegaDark 08:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Thank you for your clarification, VegaDark, but I still have to respectfully disagree. I think Pearce's story (and perhaps your own) show a slice of life people of my generation (and beyond) may not see otherwise. JABPP 10:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by Pgk. MER-C 10:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Advert . Article created by user:Meakin who, I assume is the mag's Contributing Editor for fiction, Meakin Armstrong. -- RHaworth 10:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 04:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Article fails WP:WEB for notability, does not cite sources, and appears to be nothing more than an advertisement. Ale_Jrb talk 10:12, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Notice: User:04riversj had edited this page by posting another keep comment, but also by modifying some of the delete opinions expressed above so that they favoured the website instead. Since User:04riversj is a newly created single-purpose account, let us be very clear here to any other user of the website in question who may come visit: abusing this page will not help in saving the article (quite the opposite). Modifying other people's comments is considered vandalism, and when it is done on a deletion debate, it is a most serious form of it. I have reverted said edit (anyone interested may find it here) and posted a final warning on that user's talk page. -- Nehwyn 18:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result wasDelete.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk) 14:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Disputed prod. This is an article on a fan-run game server with no referenced assertion of notability. Suggest deletion as a non-notable original creation per WP:WEB/ WP:NOT. -- Muchness 10:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted, same reasons as first time and DRV that followed. ➨ ЯEDVERS 12:12, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The entire article consists of the single sentence "The Kootenai Valley Press (also known as the Kootenai Valley Times) in a newspaper published in Bonners Ferry, Idaho."
This was previously speedily deleted by user:JzG with the comment "Empty article, devoid of context (and indeed content)". This article is identical to that version, but has one fewer stub template. Thryduulf 11:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted. ➨ ЯEDVERS 12:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A blatant hoax, complete with a Photoshopped picture. GregorB 11:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 15:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Moved from speedy. Appears to be a series of bios, so could possibly be split up but will need to be thoroughly checked for NPOV. Two of the people on the list have articles. Tim! 11:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The Vietnamese Google talks about the events that unfolded in a propaganda style. No mention of the poor South Vietnamese, of the killings and the suicides. Like I said before, this article will eventually include the totality of the month and not just what happened to the soldiers. I do have some articles from the New York Times that can back up some of the contents. The rest about the soldiers, the Pentagon did a debriefing of the South Vietnamese political and military leaders in a series called Vietnam monographs shortly after the fall of Saigon. I will cite the sources and add footnotes and references (these are in storage right now).
http://www.nytimes.com/learning/general/specials/saigon/articles.html#surrender http://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%E1%BB%B1_ki%E1%BB%87n_30_th%C3%A1ng_4,_1975
http://www.yale.edu/seas/bibliography/chapters/chap9.html. Several authors (politician/soldiers) recount their hardships and include the names that I included in the article.
Thang Tu means April, Chuyen Buon means Sad/cruel stories. This is a well known poem about the last days.
You are a pain in the ass, but you do have some good points and I do like the suggestions that you made for other articles you are reviewing. I include here the translation of the word, only because you insinuated that I made it up.:} http://vdict.com/bu%E1%BB%93n,2,0.html
The result was keep; given that the nomination and the two initial !votes were regarding a lack of sources (and hence a lack of notability), the five sources which were found counters this. I've added the five references to the article, however they need to be wikified per MOS. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 01:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Seems to be a personalised account. see also Cruel april Tim! 12:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete.-- Hús ö nd 05:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
It has been pretty much verified that there is no source for this article and that it is a hoax. -- Evertype· ✆ 12:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Questionable notability, no evidence provided to meet WP:BIO. Your notability isn't determined by who you do business with. Unreferenced. Contested prod. MER-C 12:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Meaningless buzzword. Compare the section under "Problems in a business process may arise in three places:" in WP:BOLLOCKS Leibniz 12:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable per WP:BIO. Leibniz 13:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Vanity page for non-notable person. No evidence of satisfying WP:BIO. Valrith 13:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 13:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
NN per WP:PROF ("an emerging new scholar" says as much). Leibniz 13:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 15:03, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Does not meet notability guidelines for music or people.
Mdhandley 13:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Apparent vanity, original research, spam as a business location, no notability and unencyclopedic. Nothing that could not be summed up in the main San Antonio as -San Antonio is home to a number of high tech organiosations, such as **** Nuttah68 14:04, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. DS 19:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Original research. Deproded by author without explanation. The original article contained the following: "...information about the Guler kingdom that I have obtained first-hand via research, interviews and museum study. As this research project is still in progress, I encourage anybody willing to contribute to the project to contact us." No sources given. eaolson 14:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
original resarch and listcruft. Onknkrpwxq 15:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. W.marsh 01:47, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
original research and non-notable. Onknkrpwxq 15:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Advert for the "institute", OR/ WP:BOLLOCKS, no WP:RS. Related nominations: Tom Atlee and Co-Intelligence Institute. Leibniz 17:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW and CSD G7 -- pgk 18:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Small IRC "network", we do have articles on various other IRC networks, is this sufficient to keep this on wikipedia. No vote-- pgk 15:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedily deleted as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 23:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Redirect to Evolution of sex per conflicting consensi: 1. the topic seems notable, 2. the article fails our policies, and there is no reason to believe this will change in the near future. Redirecting preserves the edit history, so it can be recreated if someone with the necessary expertise is willing to work on it. ~ trialsanderrors 03:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The page has been listed as POV since May 2005. It has not changed much at all in that time and is still POV. I propose that the page be deleted as it doesn't seem to be going anywhere. This would allow for a nice fresh start to be made if someone felt it was necessary. Localzuk (talk) 15:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I don't see how that applies. My reading is a controversy about sexual or asexual reproduction, without creationist WP:BOLLOCKS. I suggest: speedy keep, take off POV tag, but expert attention needed. Leibniz 19:21, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was keep - no other opinions presented, and not even a nominator to give a reason! Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 01:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Prod added by Fr. Wolf ( talk · contribs) with the argument that the article appeared to be created to advertise for the school and that negative or neutral statements were being repeatedly removed. Since I see insufficient evidence of that, I am moving this to AfD but am opining keep. If there is a content problem, it should be dealt as a content problem, not as a deletion. -- Nlu ( talk) 16:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Looks like vanity. Unless notability established, delete. -- Nlu ( talk) 16:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete as a copy of non-commercial licensed content. Interiot 17:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Fancruft pasted from a Start Trek-specific wiki. -- Nehwyn 16:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non-encyclopedic, original research essay, instruction manual — Hanuman Das 17:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect as per VegaDark. DS 19:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
An article about a joke, I don't think it needs it's own article. I can only imagine how many articles we would have if we gave every joke in seinfeld an article. I made a post asking for references to notability, but got no response(Only reference is to an Urban dictionary entry written by "the brockman"). HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 17:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 01:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Academic CV; not enough to meet WP:BIO or the proposed WP:PROF. -- Nehwyn 17:15, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
"Press release" page for NN local wrestling event. Googling "Championship deathlock wrestling" gets exactly 1 ghit, this Bebo user page, "Frontline Euro Wrestling" gets 6 ghits, including a Bebo page, a Wiktionary delele log page, and this WP user page Th. Author took off speedy-delete, no references, and linkless tag twice, without adding links or references. The "notability" of this event appears to be mostly wishful thinking on the part of the author. Delete and salt Tubezone 18:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Nomination: The article was created and almost exlusively maintained by the single-purpose account that created AirSage, and advertisementesque article for a company making this "technology". The technology does not get mentioned in the journals "ITS Journal - Intelligent Transportation Systems Journal"/"Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems" since 2002 (the name changed in 2004), " IEEE Proceedings: Intelligent Transport Systems" in 2006, "IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine" in 2006, or the "IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems" since 2000. It does not appear in the U.S. DOT's National ITS Architecture Version 5.1 (latest, dated 10/20/2005). There is no google hit for "floating cellular data" that doesn't link back to Wikipedia. Accordingly, I nominate this article for deletion as a WP:V violation intended to assist in a WP:CORP violation for the article AirSage (which I am also nominating for deletion). The Literate Engineer 18:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Nomination: I believe that this company fails WP:CORP and is therefore a violation of WP:NOT section 1.4.3. The article was created by what I believe is a single-purpose account promoting the company and its experimental technology, Floating Cellular Data, which also I believe fails WP:CORP and has verifiability issues. The Literate Engineer 18:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Speedy Delete per G1, A7, etc. Naconkantari 03:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete due to WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information about your dorm. If true, the information about the four-diamond rating could be at the Hatfield College article at best, but other than that, this contains no encyclopedic information, reads like a magnet for vanity, POV violations, WP:NFT games such as the "A Stairs Challenge" and "A Stairs Pool" mentioned, etc. The author asserts I'm violating his human rights by tagging this with a prod, so AfD seems like a legitimate move. -- Kinu t/ c 18:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is unsourced, contains unverifiable and likely false information about the phenomenon (thousands of rivers flow north in Asia, North Africa, Europe, Canada, Australia, and the Indonesian archipelago), contains unverifiable claims about why the supposed phenomenon exists, and does not assert the notability of the phrase "devil's river". For all the article says, the phrase (and the explanation) could have been created by the article's original writer out of thin air. If "devil's river" really is a commonly used term, the article should say at the very least who uses it, why they use it, and whether the belief is supported by reliable sources (and if so, those sources should be given). Charlene 18:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn by nominator. Zetawoof( ζ) 22:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Withdrawn You can't define main, this is clearly a violation of
WP:NPOV. The "references and notes" section just seems non-encyclopedic to me.
Michaelas10
(Talk) 19:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result was keep. W.marsh 01:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
non-notable software failing WP:SOFTWARE. Prod removed with incorrect use of Wikipedia articles as establishing notability. ju66l3r 19:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable group, does not meet WP:MUSIC. Repeated speedy deletions just keep resulting in the page getting re-created [8], so moving to AfD to settle the matter. Recommend re-speedy deletion, and page protection -- Elonka 19:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable conspiracy theorist. Appears to have made two videos "9-11 the greatest lie ever sold" and "The GOP - Grand ol Pedophiles" - both helpfully available on Google Video - but looking through the first few pages of google I don't see any hits from outside the walled garden of conspiracy theorists. Nothing on google news either. GabrielF 20:05, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non notable comic: "Jack and Mark" plus "James Harden" gives zero Google hits, as does "que inc" plus "james harden" and "que inc" plus "jack and mark". Fails WP:V thoroughly. As the article now admits, it is an unreleased school comic by a student, so fails WP:V thoroughly. Fram 20:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
No indication of significance for this theater group. The article does have as sources newpaper pages stating that they have performed, but to me this is not the nontrivial kind of coverage we'd want to have an article about this. Author's explanation of the notability of this group is "I believe an article is required as it an Irish Theatre group and contributes to Irish Theatre in general." However, there's nothing magical about Irish theatre groups that gives them automatic significance. As far as I can tell, this is what we'd call a "community theater" here- every town has several of these but they aren't generally significant. Friday (talk) 20:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This convention has no claim to notability. It had only roughly 1,000 attendees last year. It is copy of an article from wikifur, a wiki which by consensus is considered non notable. [9] [10] [11] BigE1977 20:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was redirected to hermit crab, with a link to Wikibooks added. DS 19:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A how-to guide on hermit crab care. Merge has been proposed, but pretty much all the encyclopedic information is already in Hermit crab and the entry on Wikibooks for this is far better already. Most of the info is simply a price guide or silly advice (do not shake crab). Delete as Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. Wickethewok 20:35, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Looking at the amount of edits being made to it, I realised this isn't even worth an AfD. JD talk 20:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The article is based on the hoax by IGN.com, and even IGN has already officially announced it as a hoax. Wirbelwindヴィルヴェルヴィント ( talk) 20:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep. Might have gone differently if nominator supplied a reason. — CharlotteWebb 08:22, 15 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Nominated by an IP editor without completing the AfD listing. Abstain. GTBacchus( talk) 20:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy delete per CSD G4. JD talk 20:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Unencylopedic, pointless. Delete per Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. GTBacchus( talk) 20:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Performed a Google search for ""Dragon Vomit" cocktail", no hits. Then just "Dragon Vomit", no drinks-related hits. Also performed search on the apparently related drink "Buffalo Runs", again no hits. I think this exists only as an idea in the author's mind. Gekedo 21:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Everyone should try it at least once. Saltandlite 21:24, 15 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article has been deleted five times under WP:PROD or WP:CSD. I'm nominating it mainly to settle the issue, as people are edit-warring about whether to remove the PROD tags that have once again accumulated (no, this doesn't make sense to me, either).
I'm not really sure whether we should just delete this or try and clean it up. On one hand, the guy has a surprising amount of press coverage about whatever it is he does (see this older version), but on the other hand, none of it seems to indicate substantial notability under WP:BIO. More to the point, it still reads like an advertisement in this last incarnation, and judging from the history, it would need someone really perseverant to try and make this into an encyclopedic biographical article. Sandstein 21:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedily deleted by NCurse as an empty article. Zetawoof( ζ) 16:56, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article contains no real information. — Markles 21:50, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:29, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:27, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:56, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy keep, bad-faith nom, POINT. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:31, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article is similar in scope to another article, Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia whih was deleted for no reason by two vandals, Seraphimblade ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Future Perfect at Sunrise ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). It is not deserving of a Wikipedia entry, therefore I am acting in their spirit and nominating this for deletion. 2similar 21:58, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was speedy deleted by Xoloz: "A7/G11". Zetawoof( ζ) 19:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
A Google search for this website yields only the site itself, and the name of several profiles at various social networking sites. Fails WP:CORP because I can't find any external information on the company. Also fails WP:WEB: see here and here. In addition, the text for the article was copied from the website of the organization/service. Also, nothing is on the talk page (despite the {{ hangon}}), and the speedy delete was removed by the creator of the page. I can't even tell what the site is about, Piracy? Gracenotes T § 21:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was merge and redirect to Procfs. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 05:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable. Doc aberdeen 09:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep all except the reissue, and I wonder if "The Heartless Control Everything" is a song about Wikipedia? ~ trialsanderrors 05:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Looks like this band may have notability issues per WP:MUSIC. Not being a music expert, I thought it'd be best to let the Human League Of Distinguished Music Knowledgable Editors discuss them. No vote from me. Tubezone 22:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Idk if this is the official artical about the band, but they were featured in AP the magazine alternativepress.com they are amazing and they should seriously be taken seriously. They are amazing.
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:40, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This looks like an excuse to link Wikipedia to some videos of someone swearing rather than an attempt to contribute encyclopedically. This person is hardly notable and the tone is hardly NPOV. Seems we would be better without the article - especially as the links to the swearing have been removed for copyright reasons. Spartaz 22:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. DS 22:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply
I knew someone would try to post an article on this entity since I saw the (self-proclaimed) "chairman" announce it on the RevolutionaryLeft.com message boards. Entirely non-notable, no evidence of real-world existence, no sources. — Sesel 22:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete per WP:BIO/ WP:MUSIC. -- Core desat 04:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Not only is this page painfully POV in its eulogy, with quotes such as "He would have been champ for the entire seven weeks", and "the New York Police picked him up for being in the wrong place at the wrong time", but the subject of the article would appear to be non-notable. "Twilight rapper" gets a grand total of 2 Google hits, while his nickname "Tha Futcha" gets only 140, a large whack of which would appear to be Myspace. Basically, being a contestant on a couple of radio shows does not give sufficient notability for a reputable encyclopedia. Moreschi 22:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Yall can say whatever yall want, this is not going away. This is not going away. Word up. - A Different World - Tuesday, November 14, 2006. 7:45 P.M. (Happy Birthday Obie Trice, Ja Rule Hater)
I'm telling yall, if theres no more corrections to be made, then I'm going to get rid of the grey thing that's on top. - A Different World - Tuesday, November 14, 2006. 7:49 P.M.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Rumored team, Wikipedia is not the place to start or spread rumours ( WP:NOT crystal ball). Punkmorten 22:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. W.marsh 01:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article was previously deleted here. I maintain that this is a non-notable webcomic, I doubt it has been reviewed by reliable third party sources. I have also contacted the admin who undeleted the article here about my concerns for the article. But I really do not think it can be saved. - Hahnch e n 01:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 06:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
See first AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolution music canada
This article was created in October 2006 and incorrectly tagged as reposted AfD content, for which I deleted it. It has since been pointed out that the article was not a direct repost of the deleted content, so I have recreated it.
However, I do believe that it fails Wikiepdia's notability rules. It does not verify any of its claims of notability, nor does it provide any external sources which suggest that it has had the impact it claims.
I'm not aware of any precedent about record labels - they're not mentioned at WP:MUSIC - and I thought that the best thing to do now would be to put this to a community discussion. Robdurbar 08:09, 6 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was no consencus to delete, aka merge, also known as "keep" in some states. - 152.91.9.144 06:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable, proprietary product, little if any support from third party developers. Topic should be covered by non-company-specific technology page such as Event Stream Processing, etc. Ronnotel 17:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The entry could be improved and certainly it is lacking references. It might make sense to merge this entry with the one on K (programming language). The K and KDB are tightly linked: KDB is developed in K and K itself is little used outside of KDB applications.
I do use both K and KDB and I am a fan of both, but I have no association with either Kx Systems or First Derivatives. Some of the points mentioned above might be difficult to document and I wouldn't include them in the actual entry. They are nonetheless true; I think anyone in the financial industry who deals with trade and quote data would find them uncontroversial. -- Abcarter 18:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Core desat 04:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Nonnotable Internet essay that has few links. –- kungming· 2 | (Talk· Contact) 23:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. See also prior AfD. ~ trialsanderrors 06:23, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
This article has two inherent, uncorrectable problems.
So, for these two reasons, the article and the list should be deleted. (I would also advocate deleting the Republican equivalent of this page, in case people wonder about my political leanings.) George J. Bendo 23:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete all. References have not been forthcoming; if someone believes this is notable enough and wishes to write a referenced article about this game, they are welcome to do so, but my feeling is the articles in their current totally unsourced state is not something they will be able to expand upon. Better rewrite from scratch, citing sources. Kimchi. sg 11:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Non-notable web game with a slew of crufty related articles. Danny Lilithborne 23:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete - Yomangani talk 00:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
(Included in this AfD is the article Countdown to Destruction (album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)).
The subject does not meet the criteria of WP:BAND. They do not show up on Allmusic, and the previous name, Out of Step, is the name of a blues band with 1 album. A Google search for "Hold up Your End"+Brantford shows 57 results (12 unique). A search for "Hold Up Your End"+"Countdown to Destruction" shows 2 results. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 23:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was No consensus. This should probably be renominated in due time if it isn't cleaned up anytime soon. ~ trialsanderrors 07:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Page created by self-professed organizer of the event. Numerous POV/advert/style problems resulting from autobio nature of the article. Limited notability (under 1000 Ghits for the festival name and all sponsoring groups or self-references). ju66l3r 23:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC) reply
One-sentence stub about a non-notable group. I put a speedy tag on it and User:Stifle removed it and said "I think working to eliminate child labour is notable". Crabapplecove 00:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC) reply