Template:Centralized discussion
This page is a
soft redirect.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete both articles. -
Mailer Diablo 16:23, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic. Bus routes change like hot cakes. Could possibly be transwikied to wikitravel, but I suggest delete. — Mar ka ci 2005-04-8 T 00:15 Z
Delete - my city has bus routes too, as does every town and city; definitely not encyclopaedic -- AYArktos 01:58, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete
Jinian 12:36, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Incomplete article, Google search for Emilio Cecconi returns 20 or so entries that seem unrelated to each other. I'd recommend delete, hard to say what this is about. Rx StrangeLove 22:54, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete and redirect to
Enlargement of the European Union, though the article cannot be deleted at this time. —
Xezbeth 06:52, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
This article (which hasn't been expanded at all since its creation almost a year ago) is inherently problematic and can never become encyclopedic, the way I see it. Though the term "Accession states" is common enough, its true explanation is nothing more than a definition -- namely the countries that last acceded into the European Union. When Bulgaria and Romania join, it's them that are gonna be commonly referred to as accession states, when more countries join, it'll be them, and so forth. I suggest a deletion, since all it contains and all it can possibly contain are described elsewhere, either in History of the European Union or Enlargement of the European Union or Treaty of Accession 2003, while the definition it currently provides is at the same time limited and misleading. Aris Katsaris 01:05, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP Snowspinner 01:08, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
The subject of the page now admits that he created the page, making it less questionably a vanity page. See this article for details. And note that I renominated the page not because I thought that the prior VfD debate wasn't useful, but that it would likely have been different had people known without a doubt that Mr. Farivar concocted his own page. Jason 19:01, 1 August 2005 (UTC) reply
(Follow this link -- Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Cyrus Farivar (1st nomination) -- for the historical record of this page's first VfD debate.)
New users please read: You are welcome to comment but please add your comments to the bottom of the page (not the top) and sign them by adding four tildes (~~~~) which will automatically add your username or IP address and the time and date. Please do not alter the comments or votes of others; this is considered vandalism and grounds for blocking. Please do not comment or vote multiple times pretending you are different people; such comments and votes will be deleted or ignored. Read this for more information. Thank you.
Delete -- The guy had to hype his own page in a Slate article. Isn't this what blogs are for?
Note: user's only edit. Junkyard prince 19:48, 1 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Note: user's only edit. Junkyard prince 19:48, 1 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Note: user's only edit. Junkyard prince 19:48, 1 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Delete. This guy is unimportant and the article is mere vanity. 69.250.25.213 03:55, 2 August 2005 (UTC) reply
24.199.94.32 07:35, 2 August 2005 (UTC) reply
"DELETE" Boring. Useless.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:11, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
College vanity. Evil Monkey∴ Hello 02:31, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:31, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable high-school sports coach. Delete. - Marcika 02:37, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was MERGE. Marked for deletion, not deleted due to block compression errors.
Jinian 12:34, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Ok, so it gets a few thousand Google hits, but this is an internet radio station. I doubt it is notable. The article itself is quite poor, and needs cleanup, and the fact it includes a list of (presumably) forum user names isn't very promising. Internet radio stations generally aren't notable and I think this one isn't notable enough for it's own article. As it is part of a MMORPG, I think it should be merged in to Kingdom of Loathing or deleted. Hedley 02:41, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep.
Mike H 03:58, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
Delete: CopyVio
http://www.amcpages.com/amc/whoswho/erica.php
67.101.9.98 02:50, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:31, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:31, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I find this lack of music notability disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:05, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:00, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I find this lack of music notability disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:12, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:15, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
I find this lack of music notability disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:16, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Controller.controller have gone on 1) a national tour of Canada (which is a large country) 2) multiple international tours (of both the United States in 2004 and 2005, and Britan in 2005). This band unquestionably meets the notability standard.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:19, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
I find this lack of
music notability disturbing.
Zzyzx11 |
Talk 03:19, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hope to have time to write article. Capitalistroadster 11:30, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:32, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I find the lack of music notability disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:22, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:21, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
This article lacks notability, and it has not been touched since 18 Feb 2005. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:26, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:32, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This lack of music notability is disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:28, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:32, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Tagged with { music-importance} since February. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:32, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:33, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Tagged with { music-importance} since February. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:34, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus to delete).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:00, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A letter to the editor of a newspaper doesn't make for notability I'm afraid. Hard to verify notability with Google too with a name like that. "Ian Clark Global Warming" gets a few hits for petitions he's signed and a course he teaches, etc. Fawcett5 03:34, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 17:08, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This lack of music notablility is disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:37, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE
CDC
(talk) 16:07, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I think this is all true I remember having a history lesson on it. The writer is obviously an amateur or just young and has strayed away from some of the basic facts, making it sound like nonsense. Clearly it should be refined. - Mailer Diablo 17:57, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:30, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
Notability not established. Appears to be a run-of-the mill MP, who died young and had 8 kids. Why does that establish Wikipedia notability? Smoddy | ειπετε 16:01, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
CDC
(talk) 05:10, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Books remain vague about this obscure person. 81.70.247.8 21:52, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:33, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
While this is a nice remembrance for the original writer (and I really like Joe Morrison, too), in a effort to keep Wikipedia factual, I believe this entry should be deleted. 149.152.20.106 19:04, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:05, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity/not notable Refdoc 21:25, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:38, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable. Possible vanity. Gamaliel 19:30, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:38, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus to delete).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:10, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete Agree with Dcfleck. The JPS 10:50, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:38, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not notable; vanity page. Final page I looked at which is linked from the Gaming_Horizon article; all of the editors were pretty much one-liners with external links. Chaz 03:18, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). –
AB
CD 20:42, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not notable; vanity page. Also looking at the other pages linked to by the Gaming_Horizon article to see if they are similar...
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:43, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
non-notable. -- Anonymous Cow 03:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:43, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Rock band entry. Nothing of relevance comes out of a Google search, I tried searching for the name, the name with some of the members and didn't come up with anything. Delete, non-notable. Plus when attempting to access the web site it seemed to attempt to install a piece of spyware. Rx StrangeLove 04:06, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:42, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity/Not notable. Written by User:ThePaul [12], so Delete.-- Matteh ( talk) 05:00, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
deletesubject is non-notable -- DDerby 06:06, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). –
AB
CD 20:44, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This is pure dicdef with no potential to become more than that; no potential encyclopedicity. Now, I know your first instinct, then, is to just say move to wiktionary, but it has just been transwikied, and so that is why it needs to be deleted.-- Dmcdevit 05:06, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:42, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advertisement page DDerby 05:42, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 17:09, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic, but then again the GNAA were kept so I don't know what to believe. Xezbeth 06:44, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
KeepTrolls in MMA are a rich part of its history. Hollywood Blonde 01:36, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy delete -- Carnildo 23:31, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete Nonsense. 141.211.138.85 04:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -
Mailer Diablo 16:40, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I'm new around here, but seems to be either original research or nonsense. If it isn't, it REALLY needs editing. Delete. 141.211.138.85 03:38, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Jinian 16:50, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity websitevertisement. From Asriel86's user page:
Please note that the VFD that "decided he was significant enough" was removed by him three and a half hours after it was placed on the article, [13] and that the subpage was never properly listed on vfd. — Korath ( Talk) 07:17, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:44, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This appears to be simply a humorous vanity page. Esrogs 07:44, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:12, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It's not actually about clandestine operations at all. It's about the "LaCrosse System", which we already have covered in Lacrosse (satellite). There's nothing here worth saving, a redirect from this to Lacrosse (satellite) seems inappropriate, and covert operation explains that the two are not the same. Let the redlink in Wikipedia:Requested articles/Social Sciences and Philosophy grow properly, afresh. Uncle G 11:29, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:47, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Goodness only knows what this is supposed to be. It's a bit long for speedy deletion. Deb 11:57, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 03:05, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
The article is essentially simply a list of articles on types of Korean art (most of them non-existent); it is essentially doing the job of a category. I've created the category,
Category:Korean art, and added it to all the extant articles on the list.
Mel Etitis (
Μελ Ετητης) 12:32, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was article rewritten from scratch.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:17, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Why does every other forum software on Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software and many on List_of_Internet_forum_software have a page whereas this one does not and worse it redirects to a generic page? I wrote short page for it with a link pointing outwards to where users can get more information. Someone marked it for speedy deletion and someone else put in the redirect. SLWK 11:52, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:20, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:48, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This was nominated for speedy, but doesn't fit any of the criteria. Nevertheless, delete--one google hit for the phrase, and the "none to date" under criticisms seems suspicious. Meelar (talk) 14:31, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:48, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable. 0 Google search results as an exact phrase. -- Jtalledo (talk) 14:53, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:48, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Self-reference. Xezbeth 15:02, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
CDC
(talk) 05:12, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Doesn't appear notable. No allmusic entry, "Compassionate Witness" (his one and only album) + Ananiah garners 4 google hits, and his official website is an angelfire page. Xezbeth 15:26, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
There are more Google hits than four. You must not have been looking carefully.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Submitted for speedy deletion, but advertisement is not a criteria for speedy. No vote from me, but the name gets 3400 googles. Meelar (talk) 15:36, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:45, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advertising. Xezbeth 15:41, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
CDC
(talk) 05:20, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Why are other MMOG sites such as There and Second_Life allowed to have a page whereas this one is claimed to be an advertisement? SLWK 11:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It is fairly new. Launched a few weeks ago. The thing about the game is that it is unique. It is a new genre of MMOG. Whereas There, Second Life etc are all roughly carbon copies of each other. SLWK 06:42, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Apparently Mr. Chauncy Covington arrived on Wikipedia and set up a vanity page for himself. He was scolded for doing so (see his talk page) and has retaliated by writing an article featuring the views of Chauncy Covington, "existentialist philosopher", on his perceived enemies at Wikipedia, the "elitists". This page has no value aside from its unintentional humor. Delete. Zora 15:44, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was invalid listing.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:22, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Arguably, this page is already on VfD via Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Warsaw/Vote. But that's not entirely clear. To ensure prompt deletion of the page presently containing the poll, please vote here as well -- Jerzy (t) 15:46, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Neither Graphix Global nor the software appear to be notable; "Guy Demeter" + GlobalBooks gets 0 google hits. Xezbeth 15:49, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
16-year-old from Chicago suburbs who's found the website of the Universal Life Church. Ultravanity. Meelar (talk) 15:48, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable blog. Only 11 google hits. Xezbeth 16:02, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:47, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Xezbeth 16:07, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
I wish to keep this page, as I have started a Logic Project. As I have been very busy, I am adding to this page as I get the chance. Please do not remove this page, as I believe I deserve a right to publish an article in regards to my area in the acedemic arena.
Actually, now that I think about it, the page should be deleted, and I will write an article one the project itself.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:56, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Looks like nonsense. If by some bizarre twist of fate it is true then it's unverifiable/non-notable. Xezbeth 16:12, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:33, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Just.. no. -- Conti| ✉ 16:24, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:56, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advert/vanity. Delete unless someone can make a proper article out of it. P Ingerson 16:43, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:36, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Way too specific list. -- Conti| ✉ 17:10, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
-- Halidecyphon 07:18, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:59, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Way too specific list. -- Conti| ✉ 17:09, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:38, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Way too specific list. -- Conti| ✉ 17:11, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:56, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Clearly a vanity article trying to make the person sound important. Do a search on him and you see why. -- Anonymous Cow 17:39, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy delete -- Carnildo 23:54, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Doesn't seem real. I did a Google search but I didn't see anything relevant (felt foolish doing it I have to admit). I sure haven't heard of this concept. Delete. Rx StrangeLove 17:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:41, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The Abscam blog disclosure was an issue for only a week or so. It's now mostly moot and discussed in the sponsorship scandal article. The paragraph on the ethics of publication bans should go into an article on Canadian publication bans in general. Mwalcoff 18:09, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:57, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Looks like neologism. After reading it, you would think you would find some good references for it on Google, but there currently isn't one. Zzyzx11 | Talk 18:24, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. –
AB
CD 02:19, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable student vanity. P Ingerson 18:20, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 03:10, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
This article appears to be vanity/non-notable/pov DDerby 18:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:48, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Sad story, but essentially just another non-notable child abduction bulletin. — RJH 20:01, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A generic mid-boss (that doesn't even get any dialogue) from Final Fantasy doesn't really seem to be that notable, even if it appears as a minor character in 8 Bit Theatre. A Man In Black 20:20, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:57, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Nominated due to: no content, unlikely to be used or referenced by any other articles. Could be a candidate for speedy deletion. Oliver Keenan 20:36, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
CDC
(talk) 05:07, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
No vote, need advice on articles like these. I plead to You my comrades. I guess democratic or communist, both are important, but one from Shropshire...? Feydey 20:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. (IP votes not counted) -
Mailer Diablo 17:11, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Seems to be a vanity page. Even if Arlo Rose didn't write this, I don't believe he is noteworthy enough to warrant an article here. Oliver Keenan 20:53, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep -
Mailer Diablo 17:06, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not notable enough to warrant an article of her own, even if she was one of the founders of Fisher Price I don't think her name well known. I will vote to delete this article. Oliver Keenan 21:05, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. –
AB
CD 02:19, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A group of students at a Texas high school, not affiliated with school, and by admission "contribute nothing to the world around them". On the other hand, they weren't too lazy to capitalize both letters. Well done! Delete. Meelar (talk) 21:04, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was redirect
The name of this page is incorrect, and there exists already a page with the correct name, Ferenc Martyn, with the same information, but in a wikified form. This page is completely unnecessary. -- Adam78 21:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Case closed. The article created by the same anon, who most probably didn't know about redirects. The content is the same in both. I am turning it into a redirect. Mikkalai 22:18, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 17:01, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
There is already a page, Szilágy (with a correct title), which deals with this disambiguation. Szilágy (disambiguation) is unnecessary. -- Adam78 21:43, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 02:21, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable, probable vanity (Delete). — Asbestos | Talk 22:44, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -
Mailer Diablo 17:06, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Request for deletion by entry's original author (myself) the page was created under the wrong title, this has since been corrected, apologies for the inconvenience, creating entirely new entries is new to me
I'm reinstituting the VfD request. This is advertising, no matter which version of the article name is used. Rick K 22:45, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 02:20, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Seems like vanity, just some guy with a website. Nothing links to it, either. Adam Bishop 22:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 02:20, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable vanity nonsense, delete. Rx StrangeLove 23:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Template:Centralized discussion
This page is a
soft redirect.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete both articles. -
Mailer Diablo 16:23, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic. Bus routes change like hot cakes. Could possibly be transwikied to wikitravel, but I suggest delete. — Mar ka ci 2005-04-8 T 00:15 Z
Delete - my city has bus routes too, as does every town and city; definitely not encyclopaedic -- AYArktos 01:58, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete
Jinian 12:36, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Incomplete article, Google search for Emilio Cecconi returns 20 or so entries that seem unrelated to each other. I'd recommend delete, hard to say what this is about. Rx StrangeLove 22:54, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete and redirect to
Enlargement of the European Union, though the article cannot be deleted at this time. —
Xezbeth 06:52, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
This article (which hasn't been expanded at all since its creation almost a year ago) is inherently problematic and can never become encyclopedic, the way I see it. Though the term "Accession states" is common enough, its true explanation is nothing more than a definition -- namely the countries that last acceded into the European Union. When Bulgaria and Romania join, it's them that are gonna be commonly referred to as accession states, when more countries join, it'll be them, and so forth. I suggest a deletion, since all it contains and all it can possibly contain are described elsewhere, either in History of the European Union or Enlargement of the European Union or Treaty of Accession 2003, while the definition it currently provides is at the same time limited and misleading. Aris Katsaris 01:05, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP Snowspinner 01:08, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
The subject of the page now admits that he created the page, making it less questionably a vanity page. See this article for details. And note that I renominated the page not because I thought that the prior VfD debate wasn't useful, but that it would likely have been different had people known without a doubt that Mr. Farivar concocted his own page. Jason 19:01, 1 August 2005 (UTC) reply
(Follow this link -- Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Cyrus Farivar (1st nomination) -- for the historical record of this page's first VfD debate.)
New users please read: You are welcome to comment but please add your comments to the bottom of the page (not the top) and sign them by adding four tildes (~~~~) which will automatically add your username or IP address and the time and date. Please do not alter the comments or votes of others; this is considered vandalism and grounds for blocking. Please do not comment or vote multiple times pretending you are different people; such comments and votes will be deleted or ignored. Read this for more information. Thank you.
Delete -- The guy had to hype his own page in a Slate article. Isn't this what blogs are for?
Note: user's only edit. Junkyard prince 19:48, 1 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Note: user's only edit. Junkyard prince 19:48, 1 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Note: user's only edit. Junkyard prince 19:48, 1 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Delete. This guy is unimportant and the article is mere vanity. 69.250.25.213 03:55, 2 August 2005 (UTC) reply
24.199.94.32 07:35, 2 August 2005 (UTC) reply
"DELETE" Boring. Useless.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:11, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
College vanity. Evil Monkey∴ Hello 02:31, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:31, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable high-school sports coach. Delete. - Marcika 02:37, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was MERGE. Marked for deletion, not deleted due to block compression errors.
Jinian 12:34, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Ok, so it gets a few thousand Google hits, but this is an internet radio station. I doubt it is notable. The article itself is quite poor, and needs cleanup, and the fact it includes a list of (presumably) forum user names isn't very promising. Internet radio stations generally aren't notable and I think this one isn't notable enough for it's own article. As it is part of a MMORPG, I think it should be merged in to Kingdom of Loathing or deleted. Hedley 02:41, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep.
Mike H 03:58, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
Delete: CopyVio
http://www.amcpages.com/amc/whoswho/erica.php
67.101.9.98 02:50, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:31, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:31, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I find this lack of music notability disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:05, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:00, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I find this lack of music notability disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:12, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:15, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
I find this lack of music notability disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:16, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Controller.controller have gone on 1) a national tour of Canada (which is a large country) 2) multiple international tours (of both the United States in 2004 and 2005, and Britan in 2005). This band unquestionably meets the notability standard.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:19, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
I find this lack of
music notability disturbing.
Zzyzx11 |
Talk 03:19, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Hope to have time to write article. Capitalistroadster 11:30, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:32, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I find the lack of music notability disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:22, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:21, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
This article lacks notability, and it has not been touched since 18 Feb 2005. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:26, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:32, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This lack of music notability is disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:28, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:32, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Tagged with { music-importance} since February. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:32, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:33, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Tagged with { music-importance} since February. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:34, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus to delete).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 15:00, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A letter to the editor of a newspaper doesn't make for notability I'm afraid. Hard to verify notability with Google too with a name like that. "Ian Clark Global Warming" gets a few hits for petitions he's signed and a course he teaches, etc. Fawcett5 03:34, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 17:08, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This lack of music notablility is disturbing. Zzyzx11 | Talk 03:37, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE
CDC
(talk) 16:07, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I think this is all true I remember having a history lesson on it. The writer is obviously an amateur or just young and has strayed away from some of the basic facts, making it sound like nonsense. Clearly it should be refined. - Mailer Diablo 17:57, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:30, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
Notability not established. Appears to be a run-of-the mill MP, who died young and had 8 kids. Why does that establish Wikipedia notability? Smoddy | ειπετε 16:01, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
CDC
(talk) 05:10, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Books remain vague about this obscure person. 81.70.247.8 21:52, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 01:33, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
While this is a nice remembrance for the original writer (and I really like Joe Morrison, too), in a effort to keep Wikipedia factual, I believe this entry should be deleted. 149.152.20.106 19:04, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:05, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete vanity/not notable Refdoc 21:25, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:38, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable. Possible vanity. Gamaliel 19:30, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:38, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus to delete).
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:10, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete Agree with Dcfleck. The JPS 10:50, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:38, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not notable; vanity page. Final page I looked at which is linked from the Gaming_Horizon article; all of the editors were pretty much one-liners with external links. Chaz 03:18, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). –
AB
CD 20:42, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not notable; vanity page. Also looking at the other pages linked to by the Gaming_Horizon article to see if they are similar...
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:43, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
non-notable. -- Anonymous Cow 03:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:43, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Rock band entry. Nothing of relevance comes out of a Google search, I tried searching for the name, the name with some of the members and didn't come up with anything. Delete, non-notable. Plus when attempting to access the web site it seemed to attempt to install a piece of spyware. Rx StrangeLove 04:06, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:42, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity/Not notable. Written by User:ThePaul [12], so Delete.-- Matteh ( talk) 05:00, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
deletesubject is non-notable -- DDerby 06:06, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (blk-cmp error). –
AB
CD 20:44, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This is pure dicdef with no potential to become more than that; no potential encyclopedicity. Now, I know your first instinct, then, is to just say move to wiktionary, but it has just been transwikied, and so that is why it needs to be deleted.-- Dmcdevit 05:06, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:42, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advertisement page DDerby 05:42, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 17:09, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic, but then again the GNAA were kept so I don't know what to believe. Xezbeth 06:44, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
KeepTrolls in MMA are a rich part of its history. Hollywood Blonde 01:36, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy delete -- Carnildo 23:31, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Delete Nonsense. 141.211.138.85 04:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -
Mailer Diablo 16:40, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I'm new around here, but seems to be either original research or nonsense. If it isn't, it REALLY needs editing. Delete. 141.211.138.85 03:38, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.
Jinian 16:50, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity websitevertisement. From Asriel86's user page:
Please note that the VFD that "decided he was significant enough" was removed by him three and a half hours after it was placed on the article, [13] and that the subpage was never properly listed on vfd. — Korath ( Talk) 07:17, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:44, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This appears to be simply a humorous vanity page. Esrogs 07:44, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:12, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It's not actually about clandestine operations at all. It's about the "LaCrosse System", which we already have covered in Lacrosse (satellite). There's nothing here worth saving, a redirect from this to Lacrosse (satellite) seems inappropriate, and covert operation explains that the two are not the same. Let the redlink in Wikipedia:Requested articles/Social Sciences and Philosophy grow properly, afresh. Uncle G 11:29, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:47, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Goodness only knows what this is supposed to be. It's a bit long for speedy deletion. Deb 11:57, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 03:05, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
The article is essentially simply a list of articles on types of Korean art (most of them non-existent); it is essentially doing the job of a category. I've created the category,
Category:Korean art, and added it to all the extant articles on the list.
Mel Etitis (
Μελ Ετητης) 12:32, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was article rewritten from scratch.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:17, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Why does every other forum software on Comparison_of_Internet_forum_software and many on List_of_Internet_forum_software have a page whereas this one does not and worse it redirects to a generic page? I wrote short page for it with a link pointing outwards to where users can get more information. Someone marked it for speedy deletion and someone else put in the redirect. SLWK 11:52, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:20, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:48, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This was nominated for speedy, but doesn't fit any of the criteria. Nevertheless, delete--one google hit for the phrase, and the "none to date" under criticisms seems suspicious. Meelar (talk) 14:31, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:48, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable. 0 Google search results as an exact phrase. -- Jtalledo (talk) 14:53, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:48, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Self-reference. Xezbeth 15:02, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
CDC
(talk) 05:12, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Doesn't appear notable. No allmusic entry, "Compassionate Witness" (his one and only album) + Ananiah garners 4 google hits, and his official website is an angelfire page. Xezbeth 15:26, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
There are more Google hits than four. You must not have been looking carefully.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Submitted for speedy deletion, but advertisement is not a criteria for speedy. No vote from me, but the name gets 3400 googles. Meelar (talk) 15:36, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:45, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advertising. Xezbeth 15:41, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
CDC
(talk) 05:20, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Why are other MMOG sites such as There and Second_Life allowed to have a page whereas this one is claimed to be an advertisement? SLWK 11:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It is fairly new. Launched a few weeks ago. The thing about the game is that it is unique. It is a new genre of MMOG. Whereas There, Second Life etc are all roughly carbon copies of each other. SLWK 06:42, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Apparently Mr. Chauncy Covington arrived on Wikipedia and set up a vanity page for himself. He was scolded for doing so (see his talk page) and has retaliated by writing an article featuring the views of Chauncy Covington, "existentialist philosopher", on his perceived enemies at Wikipedia, the "elitists". This page has no value aside from its unintentional humor. Delete. Zora 15:44, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was invalid listing.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:22, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Arguably, this page is already on VfD via Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Warsaw/Vote. But that's not entirely clear. To ensure prompt deletion of the page presently containing the poll, please vote here as well -- Jerzy (t) 15:46, 2005 Apr 8 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Neither Graphix Global nor the software appear to be notable; "Guy Demeter" + GlobalBooks gets 0 google hits. Xezbeth 15:49, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
16-year-old from Chicago suburbs who's found the website of the Universal Life Church. Ultravanity. Meelar (talk) 15:48, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable blog. Only 11 google hits. Xezbeth 16:02, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:47, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Xezbeth 16:07, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
I wish to keep this page, as I have started a Logic Project. As I have been very busy, I am adding to this page as I get the chance. Please do not remove this page, as I believe I deserve a right to publish an article in regards to my area in the acedemic arena.
Actually, now that I think about it, the page should be deleted, and I will write an article one the project itself.
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:56, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Looks like nonsense. If by some bizarre twist of fate it is true then it's unverifiable/non-notable. Xezbeth 16:12, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:33, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Just.. no. -- Conti| ✉ 16:24, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:56, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Advert/vanity. Delete unless someone can make a proper article out of it. P Ingerson 16:43, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:36, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Way too specific list. -- Conti| ✉ 17:10, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
-- Halidecyphon 07:18, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:59, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Way too specific list. -- Conti| ✉ 17:09, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:38, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Way too specific list. -- Conti| ✉ 17:11, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:56, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Clearly a vanity article trying to make the person sound important. Do a search on him and you see why. -- Anonymous Cow 17:39, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was speedy delete -- Carnildo 23:54, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Doesn't seem real. I did a Google search but I didn't see anything relevant (felt foolish doing it I have to admit). I sure haven't heard of this concept. Delete. Rx StrangeLove 17:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge.
Mindspillage
(spill yours?) 14:41, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
The Abscam blog disclosure was an issue for only a week or so. It's now mostly moot and discussed in the sponsorship scandal article. The paragraph on the ethics of publication bans should go into an article on Canadian publication bans in general. Mwalcoff 18:09, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:57, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Looks like neologism. After reading it, you would think you would find some good references for it on Google, but there currently isn't one. Zzyzx11 | Talk 18:24, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. –
AB
CD 02:19, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable student vanity. P Ingerson 18:20, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —
Korath (
Talk) 03:10, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
This article appears to be vanity/non-notable/pov DDerby 18:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 20:48, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Sad story, but essentially just another non-notable child abduction bulletin. — RJH 20:01, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A generic mid-boss (that doesn't even get any dialogue) from Final Fantasy doesn't really seem to be that notable, even if it appears as a minor character in 8 Bit Theatre. A Man In Black 20:20, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 16:57, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Nominated due to: no content, unlikely to be used or referenced by any other articles. Could be a candidate for speedy deletion. Oliver Keenan 20:36, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete.
CDC
(talk) 05:07, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
No vote, need advice on articles like these. I plead to You my comrades. I guess democratic or communist, both are important, but one from Shropshire...? Feydey 20:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. (IP votes not counted) -
Mailer Diablo 17:11, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Seems to be a vanity page. Even if Arlo Rose didn't write this, I don't believe he is noteworthy enough to warrant an article here. Oliver Keenan 20:53, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep -
Mailer Diablo 17:06, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Not notable enough to warrant an article of her own, even if she was one of the founders of Fisher Price I don't think her name well known. I will vote to delete this article. Oliver Keenan 21:05, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. –
AB
CD 02:19, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
A group of students at a Texas high school, not affiliated with school, and by admission "contribute nothing to the world around them". On the other hand, they weren't too lazy to capitalize both letters. Well done! Delete. Meelar (talk) 21:04, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was redirect
The name of this page is incorrect, and there exists already a page with the correct name, Ferenc Martyn, with the same information, but in a wikified form. This page is completely unnecessary. -- Adam78 21:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Case closed. The article created by the same anon, who most probably didn't know about redirects. The content is the same in both. I am turning it into a redirect. Mikkalai 22:18, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Mailer Diablo 17:01, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
There is already a page, Szilágy (with a correct title), which deals with this disambiguation. Szilágy (disambiguation) is unnecessary. -- Adam78 21:43, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 02:21, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable, probable vanity (Delete). — Asbestos | Talk 22:44, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -
Mailer Diablo 17:06, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Request for deletion by entry's original author (myself) the page was created under the wrong title, this has since been corrected, apologies for the inconvenience, creating entirely new entries is new to me
I'm reinstituting the VfD request. This is advertising, no matter which version of the article name is used. Rick K 22:45, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 02:20, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Seems like vanity, just some guy with a website. Nothing links to it, either. Adam Bishop 22:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. –
AB
CD 02:20, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable vanity nonsense, delete. Rx StrangeLove 23:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)