- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Open-source software. History is under the redirect if there's desire to merge. Star Mississippi 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
List of trademarked open-source software
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of trademarked open-source software ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cannot find evidence that the subject of "trademarked open-source software" is discussed as a group by sources as required by WP:LISTN * Pppery * it has begun... 15:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Lists. Shellwood ( talk) 16:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The topic of trademarked free/open-source software does get discussed occasionally; e.g. Linux Weekly News articles from 2010, 2013 (both about Firefox) and 2022 (about Rust, which isn't in this list). But it might be better served by a few sentences in Open-source software, which doesn't mention trademarks at all at the moment? Adam Sampson ( talk) 23:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:59, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Open-source software. History is under the redirect if there's desire to merge. Star Mississippi 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
List of trademarked open-source software
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of trademarked open-source software ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cannot find evidence that the subject of "trademarked open-source software" is discussed as a group by sources as required by WP:LISTN * Pppery * it has begun... 15:36, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Lists. Shellwood ( talk) 16:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The topic of trademarked free/open-source software does get discussed occasionally; e.g. Linux Weekly News articles from 2010, 2013 (both about Firefox) and 2022 (about Rust, which isn't in this list). But it might be better served by a few sentences in Open-source software, which doesn't mention trademarks at all at the moment? Adam Sampson ( talk) 23:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:56, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 04:59, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.