The result was Keep per WP:SNOW, (non-admin close). macy talk 21:57, 30 May 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is blatantly biased. I'm sorry but it only talks about scientists opposed to the consensus, yet there is no page that lists scientists that agree with the consensus. Besides, it is a ridiculous list anyway: I mean come on a Solid State Physicist? And his relevance to Global Warming is? Just because he's a scientist doesn't making him relevant, else we may as well let in any politician, economicist, person-in-unrelated-career etc into this article. If this article isn't deleted, I think a lot of this list needs to be purged.
^That's what I wrote on the article's talk page (yes I was the IP sorry I wasn't logged in). Basically, that's why I think this article needs to be deleted. Deamon138 ( talk) 23:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Ecoleetage ( talk) 03:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep per WP:SNOW, (non-admin close). macy talk 21:57, 30 May 2008 (UTC) reply
This article is blatantly biased. I'm sorry but it only talks about scientists opposed to the consensus, yet there is no page that lists scientists that agree with the consensus. Besides, it is a ridiculous list anyway: I mean come on a Solid State Physicist? And his relevance to Global Warming is? Just because he's a scientist doesn't making him relevant, else we may as well let in any politician, economicist, person-in-unrelated-career etc into this article. If this article isn't deleted, I think a lot of this list needs to be purged.
^That's what I wrote on the article's talk page (yes I was the IP sorry I wasn't logged in). Basically, that's why I think this article needs to be deleted. Deamon138 ( talk) 23:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC) reply
Ecoleetage ( talk) 03:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC) reply