The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 01:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Monarchies have existed for thousands of years. There have been millions of royal weddings. The article tells us that weddings of senior members of royal families are state occasions and attract national and international interest but then goes on to list weddings of "minor" royals and medieval marriage ceremonies that definitely did not attract any media attention. What could possibly be the point of this article anyway?
Surtsicna (
talk) 15:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - Clear violation of
WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not a repository of lists. There's no particular need for this page, and as the nominator stated, there's been millions of royal weddings.
Amsgearing (
talk) 16:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep but pare down to only notable weddings (i.e. those with articles) per
WP:CLT for
Category:Royal weddings and its subcats. It probably meets
WP:LISTN too, though I didn't do any searches so I can't prove that.
ansh666 02:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. I'm afraid I can't support deletion on this one. The
WP:CLT component is satisfied and the topic is notable enough for
WP:LISTN.
Ajf773 (
talk) 09:55, 23 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Agree with the previous two editors. --
Marbe166 (
talk) 15:35, 26 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
King of♥♦♣ ♠ 01:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Monarchies have existed for thousands of years. There have been millions of royal weddings. The article tells us that weddings of senior members of royal families are state occasions and attract national and international interest but then goes on to list weddings of "minor" royals and medieval marriage ceremonies that definitely did not attract any media attention. What could possibly be the point of this article anyway?
Surtsicna (
talk) 15:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete - Clear violation of
WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not a repository of lists. There's no particular need for this page, and as the nominator stated, there's been millions of royal weddings.
Amsgearing (
talk) 16:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep but pare down to only notable weddings (i.e. those with articles) per
WP:CLT for
Category:Royal weddings and its subcats. It probably meets
WP:LISTN too, though I didn't do any searches so I can't prove that.
ansh666 02:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep. I'm afraid I can't support deletion on this one. The
WP:CLT component is satisfied and the topic is notable enough for
WP:LISTN.
Ajf773 (
talk) 09:55, 23 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Agree with the previous two editors. --
Marbe166 (
talk) 15:35, 26 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.