The result was keep. So Why 11:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. References provided are either mentions-in-passing (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) or rely almost exclusively on company produced material and/or quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Edwardx ( talk) 19:51, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Procedurally adding page originally separately nominated with identical rationale; list is obviously dependent on the parent topic article and should have been bundled (see WP:MULTIAFD). postdlf ( talk) 02:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
By way of comparison, the only national member of the JC International to have its own article is the United States Junior Chamber. They, too, have an annual award (the Ten Outstanding Young Americans) and an accompanying list article for the honorees ( List of Ten Outstanding Young Americans). And all of these U.S. articles suffer the same lack of third-party sourcing. Of course, pointing to "other stuff" isn't a compelling argument in a deletion nomination. But I think we can all step back for a minute and ask ourselves whether the level of sourcing needed to keep a set of Junior Chamber articles really depends on whether we're talking about the organisation that is based in the U.S. or the one that is based in Hong Kong.
In all, I think the merger of the award article into the organisation's article will be an improvement in the coverage of the topic. Indeed, the same approach should probably be taken for the U.S. articles, as well. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 20:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
The result was keep. So Why 11:41, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. References provided are either mentions-in-passing (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) or rely almost exclusively on company produced material and/or quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Edwardx ( talk) 19:51, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Procedurally adding page originally separately nominated with identical rationale; list is obviously dependent on the parent topic article and should have been bundled (see WP:MULTIAFD). postdlf ( talk) 02:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
By way of comparison, the only national member of the JC International to have its own article is the United States Junior Chamber. They, too, have an annual award (the Ten Outstanding Young Americans) and an accompanying list article for the honorees ( List of Ten Outstanding Young Americans). And all of these U.S. articles suffer the same lack of third-party sourcing. Of course, pointing to "other stuff" isn't a compelling argument in a deletion nomination. But I think we can all step back for a minute and ask ourselves whether the level of sourcing needed to keep a set of Junior Chamber articles really depends on whether we're talking about the organisation that is based in the U.S. or the one that is based in Hong Kong.
In all, I think the merger of the award article into the organisation's article will be an improvement in the coverage of the topic. Indeed, the same approach should probably be taken for the U.S. articles, as well. NewYorkActuary ( talk) 20:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC)