The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 16:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep, but only with a major reduction down solely to the network's original and
WGN-TV-originated programming, removing syndicated dramas, sitcoms and movie block brandings. The issue with the IP adds (as it has been for eons) is 'fantasy TV vandals' trying to add their preferred sitcom/drama repeats to the article, and frankly that's of interest to few and outside of those doing deep searching back to its start in 1979, nigh unsourceable, where it's darned easier to reduce it just to original shows. Also, it's been one persistent IP that's been doing the vandalism here which has been blocked for two weeks (and will be undoubtedly re-blocked in two weeks and one minute from then); still a reduction may be better for all of our sanity. Nate•(
chatter) 04:24, 12 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 16:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep, but only with a major reduction down solely to the network's original and
WGN-TV-originated programming, removing syndicated dramas, sitcoms and movie block brandings. The issue with the IP adds (as it has been for eons) is 'fantasy TV vandals' trying to add their preferred sitcom/drama repeats to the article, and frankly that's of interest to few and outside of those doing deep searching back to its start in 1979, nigh unsourceable, where it's darned easier to reduce it just to original shows. Also, it's been one persistent IP that's been doing the vandalism here which has been blocked for two weeks (and will be undoubtedly re-blocked in two weeks and one minute from then); still a reduction may be better for all of our sanity. Nate•(
chatter) 04:24, 12 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.