The result was no consensus, without prejudice to immediate renomination. Although almost nothing of the article that was nominated remains, a new deletion discussion may be needed to discuss the new concerns. It may also be worthwhile to consider the option of merging into an alternate article, such as Delhi or Cinema of India. As regards the viability of articles of the type "Cinema in [city]", that is something which should be judged on an individual basis and with consideration for the existence of reliable sources to establish notability. – Black Falcon ( Talk) 19:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC) reply
This looks to be a classic case of Wikipedia is not a directory. Cyrus Andiron 16:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus, without prejudice to immediate renomination. Although almost nothing of the article that was nominated remains, a new deletion discussion may be needed to discuss the new concerns. It may also be worthwhile to consider the option of merging into an alternate article, such as Delhi or Cinema of India. As regards the viability of articles of the type "Cinema in [city]", that is something which should be judged on an individual basis and with consideration for the existence of reliable sources to establish notability. – Black Falcon ( Talk) 19:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC) reply
This looks to be a classic case of Wikipedia is not a directory. Cyrus Andiron 16:11, 6 September 2007 (UTC) reply