The result was redirect to Terry Alderman. There is no consensus here either way whether to merge this content to Terry Alderman or not; that conversation would be best suited to the talk page of the article or a more central location. However, there is consensus in the discussion below that the article should not remain in its current form, which redirecting achieves. Editors can, either boldly or with consensus, rescue the content from behind the redirect and perform a merge to Terry Alderman should they wish, and normal editorial process can take it from there. Daniel ( talk) 00:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:NLIST which says, "a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources". Also, note that there was a RfC on this and the consensus on WP:CRIC was to remove these statistics from bios per WP:NOTSTATS. Störm (talk) 07:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
"There's no consensus here that they should universally be included. Nor is there a clear consensus that such sections should be removed from all cricketer articles."wjemather please leave a message... 14:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
"To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources."This article is just a list of scores from ESPNCricinfo and has no independent sources covering these individual achievements as a set. Agree with nom that there should be no precedent to include these on players' articles. Ajf773 ( talk) 08:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
The result was redirect to Terry Alderman. There is no consensus here either way whether to merge this content to Terry Alderman or not; that conversation would be best suited to the talk page of the article or a more central location. However, there is consensus in the discussion below that the article should not remain in its current form, which redirecting achieves. Editors can, either boldly or with consensus, rescue the content from behind the redirect and perform a merge to Terry Alderman should they wish, and normal editorial process can take it from there. Daniel ( talk) 00:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails WP:NLIST which says, "a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources". Also, note that there was a RfC on this and the consensus on WP:CRIC was to remove these statistics from bios per WP:NOTSTATS. Störm (talk) 07:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
"There's no consensus here that they should universally be included. Nor is there a clear consensus that such sections should be removed from all cricketer articles."wjemather please leave a message... 14:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
"To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources."This article is just a list of scores from ESPNCricinfo and has no independent sources covering these individual achievements as a set. Agree with nom that there should be no precedent to include these on players' articles. Ajf773 ( talk) 08:35, 28 January 2021 (UTC)