The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment The terminology can be fixed by removing the word "Tournament", because "Performance Rating" is a widely used chess term. But there are bigger
WP:OR and lack-of-
WP:RS issues, as I argue above.
Adpete (
talk)
05:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - unless (a) the community agrees that taking measures along the lines suggested by
Adpetehere would be sufficient to save the article and (b) someone is actually willing to do that work.
MaxBrowne (
talk)
05:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete – clear example of OR. I don't know how the author arrived at a TPR for Fischer in 1963 even with his original method of computing TPRs for perfect scores, since FIDE ratings didn't exist yet.
Cobblet (
talk)
08:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - The OR problem could be solved as it is common practice for tournaments to tell players their performance rating (I do not know how the calculation is done but FIDE certainly has guidelines). However I do not quite see the claim to notability of such a list when none of those performances would get more than routine coverage in the chess press, and I suspect it is "best performances in chess ever" masquerading as a legit article. No objection to a redirect.
Tigraan (
talk)
11:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment The terminology can be fixed by removing the word "Tournament", because "Performance Rating" is a widely used chess term. But there are bigger
WP:OR and lack-of-
WP:RS issues, as I argue above.
Adpete (
talk)
05:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - unless (a) the community agrees that taking measures along the lines suggested by
Adpetehere would be sufficient to save the article and (b) someone is actually willing to do that work.
MaxBrowne (
talk)
05:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete – clear example of OR. I don't know how the author arrived at a TPR for Fischer in 1963 even with his original method of computing TPRs for perfect scores, since FIDE ratings didn't exist yet.
Cobblet (
talk)
08:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete - The OR problem could be solved as it is common practice for tournaments to tell players their performance rating (I do not know how the calculation is done but FIDE certainly has guidelines). However I do not quite see the claim to notability of such a list when none of those performances would get more than routine coverage in the chess press, and I suspect it is "best performances in chess ever" masquerading as a legit article. No objection to a redirect.
Tigraan (
talk)
11:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.