- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
List of films featuring romances of significant age disparity
- List of films featuring romances of significant age disparity ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Listcruft. WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Natg 19 ( talk) 14:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 ( talk) 14:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 ( talk) 14:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete It seems like a lot of original research is needed to put all these films together in one list, or even to say what is a significant age disparity...which of course could be different in different times and places. Kitfoxxe ( talk) 16:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Too hazy a criterion. Everything from Bull Durham (seriously?) to Harold and Maude is included. Clarityfiend ( talk) 00:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I have to agree with the others. The definition of "significant" will differ depending on a lot of factors that include time period, country, and culture, so there's really no good way to clearly define this in a way that would satisfy Wikipedia. I do think that there might be some worth in having an article about films with age disparities between their leads, but it'd have to be approached very carefully. This just isn't that. I have no problem with someone wanting to userfy this content, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:OR with unclear criteria for inclusion. K.e.coffman ( talk) 10:06, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as above, and per WP:LISTCRITERIA for ambiguous and subjective selection criteria. Narky Blert ( talk) 11:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 05:59, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
List of films featuring romances of significant age disparity
- List of films featuring romances of significant age disparity ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Listcruft. WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Natg 19 ( talk) 14:53, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 ( talk) 14:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 ( talk) 14:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete It seems like a lot of original research is needed to put all these films together in one list, or even to say what is a significant age disparity...which of course could be different in different times and places. Kitfoxxe ( talk) 16:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Too hazy a criterion. Everything from Bull Durham (seriously?) to Harold and Maude is included. Clarityfiend ( talk) 00:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I have to agree with the others. The definition of "significant" will differ depending on a lot of factors that include time period, country, and culture, so there's really no good way to clearly define this in a way that would satisfy Wikipedia. I do think that there might be some worth in having an article about films with age disparities between their leads, but it'd have to be approached very carefully. This just isn't that. I have no problem with someone wanting to userfy this content, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:OR with unclear criteria for inclusion. K.e.coffman ( talk) 10:06, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as above, and per WP:LISTCRITERIA for ambiguous and subjective selection criteria. Narky Blert ( talk) 11:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.