- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- List of family trees in Monk ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:FANCRUFT Rob Sinden ( talk) 15:51, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: As per the nom, unnecessary fancruft. Fisheriesmgmt ( talk) 19:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 23:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 23:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Definitely cruft. Necessary relationships can be described on the character list page, but we don't need family trees here to understand the show. -- MASEM ( t) 15:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow. I can't believe that this article survived for 4.5 years. There is obsessive academic interest in some fictional works, such as LoTR, but without that kind of attention, an article like this is simply cruft. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 11:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- List of family trees in Monk ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:FANCRUFT Rob Sinden ( talk) 15:51, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: As per the nom, unnecessary fancruft. Fisheriesmgmt ( talk) 19:34, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 23:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA 1000 23:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Definitely cruft. Necessary relationships can be described on the character list page, but we don't need family trees here to understand the show. -- MASEM ( t) 15:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow. I can't believe that this article survived for 4.5 years. There is obsessive academic interest in some fictional works, such as LoTR, but without that kind of attention, an article like this is simply cruft. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 11:51, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.