The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Short arbitrarily defined list that seems to be based on
WP:GREATWRONGS (why else would you list whether the writer is deaf or not, besides
WP:COATRACKING in a point about deaf superhero authors?) and includes lots of non-notable examples.
Dronebogus (
talk)
09:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Overspecific, indiscriminate list, of which most of the entries are from a single work. A "List of superheroes with disabilities" may be a better idea (even if that is something of an oxymoron).
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
19:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)reply
I wouldn't consider that to be an oxymoron.
Daredevil might have elevated abilities elsewhere, but he's still blind. Anyways, there should be a List of superheroes with disabilities. It has more notability than this. Thus I'm a delete for this, but there should be a list for the broader subject broken down by disability (deaf, blind, mental disabilities, paraplegic, etc.)
Conyo14 (
talk)
18:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - Unfortunately, this is one where there just aren't enough to generate sufficient attention in the press. Wrinkling my nose at the proposition that someone is pushing a POV just for noting that a deaf writer worked on a deaf superhero, though. — Rhododendritestalk \\
03:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Short arbitrarily defined list that seems to be based on
WP:GREATWRONGS (why else would you list whether the writer is deaf or not, besides
WP:COATRACKING in a point about deaf superhero authors?) and includes lots of non-notable examples.
Dronebogus (
talk)
09:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Overspecific, indiscriminate list, of which most of the entries are from a single work. A "List of superheroes with disabilities" may be a better idea (even if that is something of an oxymoron).
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ)
19:38, 17 June 2023 (UTC)reply
I wouldn't consider that to be an oxymoron.
Daredevil might have elevated abilities elsewhere, but he's still blind. Anyways, there should be a List of superheroes with disabilities. It has more notability than this. Thus I'm a delete for this, but there should be a list for the broader subject broken down by disability (deaf, blind, mental disabilities, paraplegic, etc.)
Conyo14 (
talk)
18:30, 19 June 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete - Unfortunately, this is one where there just aren't enough to generate sufficient attention in the press. Wrinkling my nose at the proposition that someone is pushing a POV just for noting that a deaf writer worked on a deaf superhero, though. — Rhododendritestalk \\
03:36, 19 June 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.