- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I read PWilkinson's comment as Delete... Closing as the same Wifione Message 06:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
List of Telugu Brahmins
- List of Telugu Brahmins ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet Wikipedia's criteria for standalone lists. (If someone one would please be kind enough to explain to me why there is an unreferenced BLP tag on the page, I'll be obliged.) Laun chba ller 21:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:00, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:00, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - as per nomination. CutestPenguin ( Talk) 17:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. The list may well potentially meet the criteria for standalone lists, but subject to criteria that are not clearly the case at the moment. Firstly, membership of the group concerned should be mentioned, either explicitly or in terms that require no significant synthesis, in each of the linked articles for the individuals, and reliably sourced either there or in the list. So far as I can see, if this criterion were applied to the list, it would still exist but would be far shorter. Secondly, the criterion used to assemble the list itself should have some notability in its own right and, except where used simply as a method of splitting a list that would otherwise be unwieldy, not a juxtaposition of two characteristics with no significant relationship with each other. At the moment, I am not entirely convinced, either from the list or from its related article, that Brahmins who speak Telugu constitute a group which has such notability. PWilkinson ( talk) 13:02, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, postdlf ( talk) 01:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 04:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I read PWilkinson's comment as Delete... Closing as the same Wifione Message 06:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
List of Telugu Brahmins
- List of Telugu Brahmins ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet Wikipedia's criteria for standalone lists. (If someone one would please be kind enough to explain to me why there is an unreferenced BLP tag on the page, I'll be obliged.) Laun chba ller 21:51, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:00, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:00, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - as per nomination. CutestPenguin ( Talk) 17:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. The list may well potentially meet the criteria for standalone lists, but subject to criteria that are not clearly the case at the moment. Firstly, membership of the group concerned should be mentioned, either explicitly or in terms that require no significant synthesis, in each of the linked articles for the individuals, and reliably sourced either there or in the list. So far as I can see, if this criterion were applied to the list, it would still exist but would be far shorter. Secondly, the criterion used to assemble the list itself should have some notability in its own right and, except where used simply as a method of splitting a list that would otherwise be unwieldy, not a juxtaposition of two characteristics with no significant relationship with each other. At the moment, I am not entirely convinced, either from the list or from its related article, that Brahmins who speak Telugu constitute a group which has such notability. PWilkinson ( talk) 13:02, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, postdlf ( talk) 01:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 04:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.