The result was redirect to List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country#Sweden. Plenty of valid reasons for maintaining such a list have been presented, but the content is a duplicate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 16:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
No need for such per WP:LISTCRUFT. Greenbörg (talk) 19:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
When deciding whether to create or avoid a list, the existence of a category on the same topic is irrelevant. This applies to both sides of the argument.
The list may be a valuable information source. The list is not a valuable information source as its content is already at List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country#Sweden with more information than this article has. This article consists of no prose. See WP:NOTSTATS—which as a policy surpasses MOS—especially point #3 which states that
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of informationand
Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing; accordingly, statistics should be placed in tables to enhance readability, and articles with statistics should include explanatory text providing context. Also, page views are not a measure of notability.
page views are not a measure of notability.
The result was redirect to List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country#Sweden. Plenty of valid reasons for maintaining such a list have been presented, but the content is a duplicate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 16:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
No need for such per WP:LISTCRUFT. Greenbörg (talk) 19:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
When deciding whether to create or avoid a list, the existence of a category on the same topic is irrelevant. This applies to both sides of the argument.
The list may be a valuable information source. The list is not a valuable information source as its content is already at List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country#Sweden with more information than this article has. This article consists of no prose. See WP:NOTSTATS—which as a policy surpasses MOS—especially point #3 which states that
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of informationand
Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing; accordingly, statistics should be placed in tables to enhance readability, and articles with statistics should include explanatory text providing context. Also, page views are not a measure of notability.
page views are not a measure of notability.