The result was merge to McNulty. J04n( talk page) 13:23, 29 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Content fork of McNulty. Any famous McNulty's should go on the page related to the surname. Additionally Wikipedia isn't here for geneological purposes and articles aren't created solely to aid in research. Canterbury Tail talk 23:23, 21 April 2013 (UTC) reply
There is also sound reason for retaining the List, itself, but separately from the McNulty article, with only those persons who are not linked to a separate Wikipedia article on them redacted from the List (wether surnamed McNulty or not) and with an improved titling for the list. The list is relevant to the history of Ireland, at least European Medical History and, particularly to the MacDonlevy dynasty, who were the last line of rulers of the ancient Irish Kingdom of Ultonia Kings of Ulster and one of the ancient hereditary medical families of Ireland, who adopted the surname McNulty as an agnomen surname (See John O'Hart, Irish Pedigrees, 1871, cited in List article. See also entries in Annals of the Four Masters noting Donlevy using McNulty alias in Tyrconnell) and whose decendants, including the missionary doctor David Livingstone (See reference to Black also in List article) often operated under non obvious habitual surnames. (See references to Black and Paul McNulty in the List article) The List is also relevant to the MacDonlevy's continued profound influence in diaspora on Western society in as far flung regions as Argentina and their identification. (See Susan Wilkinson "Early Medical Education in Ireland", Irish Medical Studies in Latin America, Vol. 5, No. 3, Nov. 2008.) Also, I do not understand why historical researchers, including genealogical researchers, should not be anticipated to use the Wikipedia as a research tool. Albiet ( talk) 17:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Albiet Albiet ( talk) 20:14, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Albiet Albiet ( talk) 20:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC) Albiet Albiet ( talk) 17:56, 25 April 2013 (UTC) Albiet reply
The result was merge to McNulty. J04n( talk page) 13:23, 29 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Content fork of McNulty. Any famous McNulty's should go on the page related to the surname. Additionally Wikipedia isn't here for geneological purposes and articles aren't created solely to aid in research. Canterbury Tail talk 23:23, 21 April 2013 (UTC) reply
There is also sound reason for retaining the List, itself, but separately from the McNulty article, with only those persons who are not linked to a separate Wikipedia article on them redacted from the List (wether surnamed McNulty or not) and with an improved titling for the list. The list is relevant to the history of Ireland, at least European Medical History and, particularly to the MacDonlevy dynasty, who were the last line of rulers of the ancient Irish Kingdom of Ultonia Kings of Ulster and one of the ancient hereditary medical families of Ireland, who adopted the surname McNulty as an agnomen surname (See John O'Hart, Irish Pedigrees, 1871, cited in List article. See also entries in Annals of the Four Masters noting Donlevy using McNulty alias in Tyrconnell) and whose decendants, including the missionary doctor David Livingstone (See reference to Black also in List article) often operated under non obvious habitual surnames. (See references to Black and Paul McNulty in the List article) The List is also relevant to the MacDonlevy's continued profound influence in diaspora on Western society in as far flung regions as Argentina and their identification. (See Susan Wilkinson "Early Medical Education in Ireland", Irish Medical Studies in Latin America, Vol. 5, No. 3, Nov. 2008.) Also, I do not understand why historical researchers, including genealogical researchers, should not be anticipated to use the Wikipedia as a research tool. Albiet ( talk) 17:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Albiet Albiet ( talk) 20:14, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Albiet Albiet ( talk) 20:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC) Albiet Albiet ( talk) 17:56, 25 April 2013 (UTC) Albiet reply