The result was keep. While there are ideas here for how this and related content should be organized and cleaned up (which can continue on the article talk pages), there isn't a consensus to delete here. Michig ( talk) 07:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC) reply
This was discussed at DRV. The consensus is that the previous deletion is valid but that this should be relisted. As such, non-consensus here should revert to the status quo - which is no article. As the DRV closer this is a procedural nomination and I am neutral. Spartaz Humbug! 08:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC) Spartaz Humbug! 08:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. While there are ideas here for how this and related content should be organized and cleaned up (which can continue on the article talk pages), there isn't a consensus to delete here. Michig ( talk) 07:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC) reply
This was discussed at DRV. The consensus is that the previous deletion is valid but that this should be relisted. As such, non-consensus here should revert to the status quo - which is no article. As the DRV closer this is a procedural nomination and I am neutral. Spartaz Humbug! 08:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC) Spartaz Humbug! 08:11, 11 January 2013 (UTC) reply