![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 January 25. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. The prevailing sentiment is that this article is not only much too inadequately sourced, but also violates WP:NOT#MEMORIAL, which we tend to understand also as prohibiting the excessively detailed reporting of incidents resulting in very numerous deaths (such as large-scale accidents, massacres or wars), whether or not the people who have died are actually named. I'm amenable to userfying this if someone believes that this could be the basis of a much more concise, well-sourced section in some appropriate article (to the extent that consensus allows for its inclusion and such content does not already exist). Sandstein 07:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a memorial. Nor is Wikipedia a soapbox. While deep sympathy goes out to those associated with the victims, this is not the place to create a memorial to them. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 00:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep. These type of lists are not memorials or soapboxes. See:
Comment. More casualty lists:
I think that these Wikipedia lists are encyclopedic and relevant. They are WP:NPOV. And they have multiple references for some entries. Very useful for readers and researchers. The list in question here could benefit from some more references for some of the individual entries. -- Timeshifter ( talk) 13:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment: What do people think about merging this information to the pages Causalities of the 2008-2009 Gaza Conflict and Causalities of the 2007-2008 Gaza Conflict, both of which I believe were proposed for creation before? The Squicks ( talk) 20:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep:
January 1rst
Nizar Rayan senior commander Total civilian casualties - XX
-- Roaring Siren ( talk) 20:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 January 25. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. The prevailing sentiment is that this article is not only much too inadequately sourced, but also violates WP:NOT#MEMORIAL, which we tend to understand also as prohibiting the excessively detailed reporting of incidents resulting in very numerous deaths (such as large-scale accidents, massacres or wars), whether or not the people who have died are actually named. I'm amenable to userfying this if someone believes that this could be the basis of a much more concise, well-sourced section in some appropriate article (to the extent that consensus allows for its inclusion and such content does not already exist). Sandstein 07:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia is not a memorial. Nor is Wikipedia a soapbox. While deep sympathy goes out to those associated with the victims, this is not the place to create a memorial to them. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 00:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep. These type of lists are not memorials or soapboxes. See:
Comment. More casualty lists:
I think that these Wikipedia lists are encyclopedic and relevant. They are WP:NPOV. And they have multiple references for some entries. Very useful for readers and researchers. The list in question here could benefit from some more references for some of the individual entries. -- Timeshifter ( talk) 13:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Comment: What do people think about merging this information to the pages Causalities of the 2008-2009 Gaza Conflict and Causalities of the 2007-2008 Gaza Conflict, both of which I believe were proposed for creation before? The Squicks ( talk) 20:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Keep:
January 1rst
Nizar Rayan senior commander Total civilian casualties - XX
-- Roaring Siren ( talk) 20:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC) reply