The result was no consensus. Not much to say- there's no consensus to delete this, but also no full consensus to keep it, either. Courcelles ( talk) 01:06, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this for deletion because during a discussion here there was broad consensus that subcategories should be notable per se, which this list seem to fail. Sandman888 ( talk) 20:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC) reply
I vote delete - it should be noted that I'm of the opinion that 90% of 'list of' articles should be removed from Wikipedia unless there's really a compelling reason for the list. Many of these lists are created to push a POV, and succeed in that aim regardless of the accuracy of the article. In this case, the relatively benign aim of the article seems to be to promote Princeton University, which isn't the worst thing in the world, but it's not the point of an encyclopedia. Nwlaw63 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC). reply
Keep Interesting format, useful information presented presumably as a "See Also" off the main Princeton University page. This is well crafted and informative and there should be a very high bar set for deletion of such fare. Not liking lists or thinking it flacks too much for a particular school do not seem to be anywhere near sufficient for deletion. Carrite ( talk) 04:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus. Not much to say- there's no consensus to delete this, but also no full consensus to keep it, either. Courcelles ( talk) 01:06, 10 June 2010 (UTC) reply
I am nominating this for deletion because during a discussion here there was broad consensus that subcategories should be notable per se, which this list seem to fail. Sandman888 ( talk) 20:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC) reply
I vote delete - it should be noted that I'm of the opinion that 90% of 'list of' articles should be removed from Wikipedia unless there's really a compelling reason for the list. Many of these lists are created to push a POV, and succeed in that aim regardless of the accuracy of the article. In this case, the relatively benign aim of the article seems to be to promote Princeton University, which isn't the worst thing in the world, but it's not the point of an encyclopedia. Nwlaw63 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC). reply
Keep Interesting format, useful information presented presumably as a "See Also" off the main Princeton University page. This is well crafted and informative and there should be a very high bar set for deletion of such fare. Not liking lists or thinking it flacks too much for a particular school do not seem to be anywhere near sufficient for deletion. Carrite ( talk) 04:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC) reply