The result was keep. causa sui ( talk) 18:49, 14 November 2011 (UTC) reply
This article is all repeated information. There are already long-standing number-ones lists, for various countries and several U.S. Billboard charts, that are arranged by year (most notably Template:USNumber1s). This does nothing but combine 2010 and 2011 together. Looks like incorrect use of decorative flags ( WP:FLAG) and an ongoing, unecessary tally of current pop artists at the bottom. There really is no need to have this article in the encyclopedia when we have this data elsewhere. If anything, attention should be made to improving the by-year lists already in place. - eo ( talk) 15:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. causa sui ( talk) 18:49, 14 November 2011 (UTC) reply
This article is all repeated information. There are already long-standing number-ones lists, for various countries and several U.S. Billboard charts, that are arranged by year (most notably Template:USNumber1s). This does nothing but combine 2010 and 2011 together. Looks like incorrect use of decorative flags ( WP:FLAG) and an ongoing, unecessary tally of current pop artists at the bottom. There really is no need to have this article in the encyclopedia when we have this data elsewhere. If anything, attention should be made to improving the by-year lists already in place. - eo ( talk) 15:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC) reply