The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. v/r -
TP 00:19, 21 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Separate pages do not exist listing all of the provincial NDP, Conservative or Liberal leaders in Canada. Therefore this article is not necessary.
Aaaccc (
talk), 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Keep - Clearly encyclopedic list. This is not TV show cruft, these are provincial party leaders. The fact that
WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNOTEXIST is a lousy rationale for deletion of this useful set of in-links.
Carrite (
talk) 04:13, 8 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep Aaaccc has not given a logical, policy based reason to delete this list. If this list is kept and similar lists are created for Canada's other political parties, and parties of other countries as well, this will be an improvement of the encyclopedia. Carrite is correct about the rationale.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 05:04, 8 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Other political parties have the same information as part of their article not as a separate article because it is not necessary.
Aaaccc (
talk), 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 00:00, 14 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep and expand. The article title suggests that all historical leaders of the party since its founding are to be included, regardless of whether they meet our notability guidelines as individuals, yet it only contains the current leaders. -- Blanchardb-Me•
MyEars•
MyMouth- timed 00:30, 14 October 2011 (UTC)reply
As for the deletion rationale, let's make pages for those bigger parties, shall we? -- Blanchardb-Me•
MyEars•
MyMouth- timed 00:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep - WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNOTEXIST does not exist for a reason. Encyclopedias are expanded by the creation of 'new' articles. Exit2DOS •
Ctrl •
Alt •
Del 23:24, 14 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Why would we do that? That title implies a completely different topic. Also, that page already exists. Could you please also clarify that second sentence, you don't want some Canadian political party bosses for...? I am really confused by your comment, perhaps you don't understand the article that is up for discussion.
117Avenue (
talk) 02:51, 15 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep or redirect. Clearly notable information. Less important to me where it is kept, than that it be retained.--
Epeefleche (
talk) 23:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. v/r -
TP 00:19, 21 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Separate pages do not exist listing all of the provincial NDP, Conservative or Liberal leaders in Canada. Therefore this article is not necessary.
Aaaccc (
talk), 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Keep - Clearly encyclopedic list. This is not TV show cruft, these are provincial party leaders. The fact that
WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNOTEXIST is a lousy rationale for deletion of this useful set of in-links.
Carrite (
talk) 04:13, 8 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep Aaaccc has not given a logical, policy based reason to delete this list. If this list is kept and similar lists are created for Canada's other political parties, and parties of other countries as well, this will be an improvement of the encyclopedia. Carrite is correct about the rationale.
Cullen328Let's discuss it 05:04, 8 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Other political parties have the same information as part of their article not as a separate article because it is not necessary.
Aaaccc (
talk), 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 00:00, 14 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep and expand. The article title suggests that all historical leaders of the party since its founding are to be included, regardless of whether they meet our notability guidelines as individuals, yet it only contains the current leaders. -- Blanchardb-Me•
MyEars•
MyMouth- timed 00:30, 14 October 2011 (UTC)reply
As for the deletion rationale, let's make pages for those bigger parties, shall we? -- Blanchardb-Me•
MyEars•
MyMouth- timed 00:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep - WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNOTEXIST does not exist for a reason. Encyclopedias are expanded by the creation of 'new' articles. Exit2DOS •
Ctrl •
Alt •
Del 23:24, 14 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Why would we do that? That title implies a completely different topic. Also, that page already exists. Could you please also clarify that second sentence, you don't want some Canadian political party bosses for...? I am really confused by your comment, perhaps you don't understand the article that is up for discussion.
117Avenue (
talk) 02:51, 15 October 2011 (UTC)reply
Keep or redirect. Clearly notable information. Less important to me where it is kept, than that it be retained.--
Epeefleche (
talk) 23:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.