The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - a list like this will always have major issues; one person's villain is another person's antihero; how many sources need to call someone a villain before they can be listed here? What if someone has more than one 'landmark role'? What if someone almost always plays a protagonist but has one notable antagonist role? Should they be listed here? This whole article looks like someone's own personal project and isn't appropriate for Wikipedia at all
Spiderone 08:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep We have numerous
lists of villains and so the concept and classification is well-established here. It seems easy to source notable examples – see the Encyclopaedia of Hindi Cinema, for example.
Andrew🐉(
talk) 09:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Andrew Davidson: This isn't a list of villains, its a list of Bollywood actors who have played villains.
★Trekker (
talk) 10:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Close enough. I am familiar with Hollywood actors who were known for playing villains, such as
Wallace Beery and
Jack Palance. My impression is that Bollywood productions are quite meolodramatic and stereotyped and so the concept will be especially strong there.
Andrew🐉(
talk) 10:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"Close enough" isnt really good enough in my opinion. There are tons of American actors who are known for playing villains, but I don't think listing people by role type is very Wikipedia fitting.
★Trekker (
talk) 10:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
It's better than the nomination's "rather pointless". See
WP:POT and
WP:SAUCE.
Andrew🐉(
talk) 17:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Yeah no. Can't agree with that.
★Trekker (
talk) 18:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Very good point re.
WP:ANTAGONIST. I was not aware of that previously.
Spiderone 17:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
WP:ANTAGONIST is a bad point taken out of context. It refers to articles about individual films in which "a well-written plot summary should convey such roles". The topic we have here is different and the relevant guideline is
WP:LISTN which it clearly passes. See Times of India, for example.
Andrew🐉(
talk) 17:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Again, this article lists actors, not their characters.
★Trekker (
talk) 18:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Actors cannot be labelled as antagonists, which is what the list is doing. So its well within the context, in my view. --
Ab207 (
talk) 17:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Yes I agree it should be deleted.
★Trekker (
talk) 22:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: WP:OR and WP:POV issues //
Timothy :: talk 20:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
delete This is pure original research, and POV. Just one example
Boman Irani′s character is not a villain in the film
Munnabhai MBBS. The character is simply someone who is not on the same terms with protagonist. Thats not even addressing the sourcing concerns. —usernamekiran
(talk) 14:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete - a list like this will always have major issues; one person's villain is another person's antihero; how many sources need to call someone a villain before they can be listed here? What if someone has more than one 'landmark role'? What if someone almost always plays a protagonist but has one notable antagonist role? Should they be listed here? This whole article looks like someone's own personal project and isn't appropriate for Wikipedia at all
Spiderone 08:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep We have numerous
lists of villains and so the concept and classification is well-established here. It seems easy to source notable examples – see the Encyclopaedia of Hindi Cinema, for example.
Andrew🐉(
talk) 09:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Andrew Davidson: This isn't a list of villains, its a list of Bollywood actors who have played villains.
★Trekker (
talk) 10:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Close enough. I am familiar with Hollywood actors who were known for playing villains, such as
Wallace Beery and
Jack Palance. My impression is that Bollywood productions are quite meolodramatic and stereotyped and so the concept will be especially strong there.
Andrew🐉(
talk) 10:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
"Close enough" isnt really good enough in my opinion. There are tons of American actors who are known for playing villains, but I don't think listing people by role type is very Wikipedia fitting.
★Trekker (
talk) 10:42, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
It's better than the nomination's "rather pointless". See
WP:POT and
WP:SAUCE.
Andrew🐉(
talk) 17:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Yeah no. Can't agree with that.
★Trekker (
talk) 18:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Very good point re.
WP:ANTAGONIST. I was not aware of that previously.
Spiderone 17:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
WP:ANTAGONIST is a bad point taken out of context. It refers to articles about individual films in which "a well-written plot summary should convey such roles". The topic we have here is different and the relevant guideline is
WP:LISTN which it clearly passes. See Times of India, for example.
Andrew🐉(
talk) 17:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Again, this article lists actors, not their characters.
★Trekker (
talk) 18:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Actors cannot be labelled as antagonists, which is what the list is doing. So its well within the context, in my view. --
Ab207 (
talk) 17:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Yes I agree it should be deleted.
★Trekker (
talk) 22:25, 10 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: WP:OR and WP:POV issues //
Timothy :: talk 20:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)reply
delete This is pure original research, and POV. Just one example
Boman Irani′s character is not a villain in the film
Munnabhai MBBS. The character is simply someone who is not on the same terms with protagonist. Thats not even addressing the sourcing concerns. —usernamekiran
(talk) 14:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.