The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There are several other identical Taipei lists for different years; please be sure to bundle them with this nomination as your argument affects them all equally and they should not be listed separately. postdlf (talk) 18:52, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Taiwan’s film industry has the problem of "
box office transparency". Only Taiwan’s capital, Taipei, always has complete disclosure of box office information. Therefore, the film industry always uses Taipei box office to evaluate the box office performance of the entire Taiwan market. It is precisely because of problem of box office transparency resulting in the city box office list appears. Regarding the lack of sources, it can be revised from the Chinese version of individual articles, and there is absolutely no problem with the source situation about Taipei box office. There is a problem with Taiwan box office' s sources, not Taipei box office' s. Please don't mix them up. --
寒吉 (
talk) 11:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
But why should Taipei as the only city in the world have such a list?
Geschichte (
talk) 11:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
If I understand
寒吉 correctly, it replaces the figure for all of Taiwan because of data problems for the rest of the country. If this is the case, I would allow it.
寒吉, please confirm!
gidonb (
talk) 15:21, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891TalkWork 14:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Yes. --
寒吉 (
talk) 03:46, 1 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all. This is instead, not an addition to, national lists. As confirmed above, national lists would have data problems.
gidonb (
talk) 10:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all per the information from
寒吉 above. //
Timothy :: talk 11:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There are several other identical Taipei lists for different years; please be sure to bundle them with this nomination as your argument affects them all equally and they should not be listed separately. postdlf (talk) 18:52, 23 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep Taiwan’s film industry has the problem of "
box office transparency". Only Taiwan’s capital, Taipei, always has complete disclosure of box office information. Therefore, the film industry always uses Taipei box office to evaluate the box office performance of the entire Taiwan market. It is precisely because of problem of box office transparency resulting in the city box office list appears. Regarding the lack of sources, it can be revised from the Chinese version of individual articles, and there is absolutely no problem with the source situation about Taipei box office. There is a problem with Taiwan box office' s sources, not Taipei box office' s. Please don't mix them up. --
寒吉 (
talk) 11:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)reply
But why should Taipei as the only city in the world have such a list?
Geschichte (
talk) 11:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
If I understand
寒吉 correctly, it replaces the figure for all of Taiwan because of data problems for the rest of the country. If this is the case, I would allow it.
寒吉, please confirm!
gidonb (
talk) 15:21, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891TalkWork 14:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Yes. --
寒吉 (
talk) 03:46, 1 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all. This is instead, not an addition to, national lists. As confirmed above, national lists would have data problems.
gidonb (
talk) 10:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep all per the information from
寒吉 above. //
Timothy :: talk 11:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.