The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:26, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This kingdom has been defunct since 1957. This technically unsourced article looks like unverifiable original research, including about the supposed royal status of living persons ( WP:BLP). See also WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne for a similar case. Norden1990 ( talk) 22:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to the Tunisian throne to WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the monarchy doesn't exist anymore. TompaDompa ( talk) 23:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:26, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This kingdom has been defunct since 1957. This technically unsourced article looks like unverifiable original research, including about the supposed royal status of living persons ( WP:BLP). See also WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Compare Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne for a similar case. Norden1990 ( talk) 22:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and articles that are themselves hoaxes (but not articles describing notable hoaxes). It is impossible to attribute the current line of succession to the Tunisian throne to WP:RELIABLE sources, because there is no current line of succession, because the monarchy doesn't exist anymore. TompaDompa ( talk) 23:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)