The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus to delete. But consensus that, if we do have an article, if should be about
Mold (magazine). Sandstein 06:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC)reply
BLP on Non-notable person, who's claim to fame appears to be a magazine kickstarter. Sources do little to establish notability and a web search yields nothing significant. Polyamorph (
talk) 20:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment I think it would make sense to rename the article to
MOLD (magazine) because it is primarily about the magazine, not its editor.
Vexations (
talk) 11:28, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
I would agree except I can't find significant coverage to satisfy notability for this magazine kickstarter either.Polyamorph (
talk) 11:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Why not Designo, Metropolis and Saveur?
Vexations (
talk) 12:05, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
They give the magazine some coverage yes, but is it non trivial significant coverage to satisfy
WP:NPOV? I would say no. Polyamorph (
talk) 12:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 03:21, 19 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 04:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Agreed. Change the article to be about MOLD magazine (which all the references are discussing) and include Yuan in that article.
Ross-c (
talk) 08:53, 27 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment. The article is about the person. Not the magazine. The sources might be about the magazine but moving to
MOLD (magazine), a page that does not exist, will require a complete rewrite. Who is going to do this? Besides, what in your opinion makes the magazine notable? Polyamorph (
talk) 09:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect to
Mold (magazine) which is the main subject of the significant coverage (what there is) from the RS available.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 18:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus to delete. But consensus that, if we do have an article, if should be about
Mold (magazine). Sandstein 06:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC)reply
BLP on Non-notable person, who's claim to fame appears to be a magazine kickstarter. Sources do little to establish notability and a web search yields nothing significant. Polyamorph (
talk) 20:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment I think it would make sense to rename the article to
MOLD (magazine) because it is primarily about the magazine, not its editor.
Vexations (
talk) 11:28, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
I would agree except I can't find significant coverage to satisfy notability for this magazine kickstarter either.Polyamorph (
talk) 11:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Why not Designo, Metropolis and Saveur?
Vexations (
talk) 12:05, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
They give the magazine some coverage yes, but is it non trivial significant coverage to satisfy
WP:NPOV? I would say no. Polyamorph (
talk) 12:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 03:21, 19 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanztalk 04:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Agreed. Change the article to be about MOLD magazine (which all the references are discussing) and include Yuan in that article.
Ross-c (
talk) 08:53, 27 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment. The article is about the person. Not the magazine. The sources might be about the magazine but moving to
MOLD (magazine), a page that does not exist, will require a complete rewrite. Who is going to do this? Besides, what in your opinion makes the magazine notable? Polyamorph (
talk) 09:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Merge and redirect to
Mold (magazine) which is the main subject of the significant coverage (what there is) from the RS available.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 18:48, 4 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.