- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- LesserEvil ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I proposed this page for deletion for not establishing its notability under WP:ORGCRIT last week but recently another user objected by removing the tag. Nonetheless, all the sources, as can be seen from the table below, fail to meet the necessary criteria because they are almost all press releases or otherwise non-independent. I've looked for other sources that meet the required standards but found none.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Press Release 1 |  Press releases are not independent sources
|
Press releases are non-reliable
|
|
✘ No |
| Stub in local news | Relies almost exclusively on company filings
|
Relies almost exclusively on company filings
|
~ The whole stub is dedicated to the company but it is barely two short paragraphs. | ✘ No |
| Just-Food article | Relies on press releases and quotes
|
Relies on press releases and quotes
|
|
✘ No |
| Press release 2 | Press releases are not independent sources
|
Press releases are non-reliable
|
|
✘ No |
| Dr Oz | ? Link has WP:ROTd away | ? Link has WP:ROTd away | ? Link has WP:ROTd away | ? Unknown |
| Rachel Ray Show | ? Link has WP:ROTd away | ? Link has WP:ROTd away | ? Link has WP:ROTd away | ? Unknown |
| Hungry Girl Blog | No apparent connection with company
|
It is a blog dedicated to promoting dieting methods and recipes.
|
Only mentions one
WP:PRODUCT of the company's
|
✘ No |
| Inc List | ? While the link has WP:ROTd away, it seems to have been a mere inclusion in a profile list | While the link has
WP:ROTd away, it seems to have been a mere inclusion in a profile list
|
While the link has
WP:ROTd away, it seems to have been a mere inclusion in a profile list
|
✘ No |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. | ||||
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and Connecticut. Jtrrs0 ( talk) 10:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly fails WP:NCORP. Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 12:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 11:02, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- LesserEvil ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I proposed this page for deletion for not establishing its notability under WP:ORGCRIT last week but recently another user objected by removing the tag. Nonetheless, all the sources, as can be seen from the table below, fail to meet the necessary criteria because they are almost all press releases or otherwise non-independent. I've looked for other sources that meet the required standards but found none.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Press Release 1 | Press releases are not independent sources
|
Press releases are non-reliable
|
|
✘ No |
| Stub in local news | Relies almost exclusively on company filings
|
Relies almost exclusively on company filings
|
~ The whole stub is dedicated to the company but it is barely two short paragraphs. | ✘ No |
| Just-Food article | Relies on press releases and quotes
|
Relies on press releases and quotes
|
|
✘ No |
| Press release 2 | Press releases are not independent sources
|
Press releases are non-reliable
|
|
✘ No |
| Dr Oz | ? Link has WP:ROTd away | ? Link has WP:ROTd away | ? Link has WP:ROTd away | ? Unknown |
| Rachel Ray Show | ? Link has WP:ROTd away | ? Link has WP:ROTd away | ? Link has WP:ROTd away | ? Unknown |
| Hungry Girl Blog | No apparent connection with company
|
It is a blog dedicated to promoting dieting methods and recipes.
|
Only mentions one
WP:PRODUCT of the company's
|
✘ No |
| Inc List | ? While the link has WP:ROTd away, it seems to have been a mere inclusion in a profile list | While the link has
WP:ROTd away, it seems to have been a mere inclusion in a profile list
|
While the link has
WP:ROTd away, it seems to have been a mere inclusion in a profile list
|
✘ No |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. | ||||
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and Connecticut. Jtrrs0 ( talk) 10:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly fails WP:NCORP. Best Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 12:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.