The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Procedural keep -- Nominator regularly bypasses WP:BEFORE searches (see
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10, etc. within the past few days) and fails to address
WP:GNG in his nominations. Regardless, 50 AfDs in 30 minutes is wholly inappropriate.
JTtheOG (
talk)
21:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Nominator comment: You're the one who de-prodded all of my nominations, so you don't get to complain now that they're at AFD, which is where nominations go when the PROD has been removed. Add to that your bad faith aspersions. A disagreement as to what qualifies as "significant coverage" is not evidence of bypassing anything.
Bgsu98(Talk)21:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Procedural keep, per JTtheOG. Additionally, I'm not aware of a rule that prohibits an editor who de-PRODs an article from participating in AfD discussions about that article.
Hydrangeans (
she/her |
talk |
edits)
07:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Procedural keep -- Nominator regularly bypasses WP:BEFORE searches (see
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10, etc. within the past few days) and fails to address
WP:GNG in his nominations. Regardless, 50 AfDs in 30 minutes is wholly inappropriate.
JTtheOG (
talk)
21:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Nominator comment: You're the one who de-prodded all of my nominations, so you don't get to complain now that they're at AFD, which is where nominations go when the PROD has been removed. Add to that your bad faith aspersions. A disagreement as to what qualifies as "significant coverage" is not evidence of bypassing anything.
Bgsu98(Talk)21:23, 10 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Procedural keep, per JTtheOG. Additionally, I'm not aware of a rule that prohibits an editor who de-PRODs an article from participating in AfD discussions about that article.
Hydrangeans (
she/her |
talk |
edits)
07:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.