The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article has no citations and only a link to the organization’s website. It has no elected officials or electoral history. Organization does not appear to have
significant, non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. ToaNidhiki05 15:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete a completely unsourced article that has been here - with nary a source - since Trotsky was alive. OK, maybe not that long, but since 2004 with no sources. gBooks shows nearly nothing
[1].
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 20:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC) strike iVote per sources found.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 09:58, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep. I see coverage
here,
here, its website has been saved by the Taminent Library at New York University
[2], and
here. A quick search produces these sources and it seems clear that a more thorough search would produce more. At the barest minimum, the content should be merged to
Revolutionary Socialist League (U.S.) and the page redirected. However, given the sourcing above, it seems clear that the article should be kept and improved.--
TM 00:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Your second source is from Proletarian Revolution, which is this organization’s magazine. That’s self-publication and doesn’t establish notability or significant, non-trivial coverage The other three don’t qualify as
significant, non-trivial coverage, and the last two aren’t even coverage at all. I would be supportive of a merge to Revolutionary Socialist League however. ToaNidhiki05 12:17, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
Scott Burley (
talk) 02:48, 7 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Note to closing editor. There is consensus here, with all 4 editors who have come to the page agreeing to the proposed merge.10:12, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article has no citations and only a link to the organization’s website. It has no elected officials or electoral history. Organization does not appear to have
significant, non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. ToaNidhiki05 15:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete a completely unsourced article that has been here - with nary a source - since Trotsky was alive. OK, maybe not that long, but since 2004 with no sources. gBooks shows nearly nothing
[1].
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 20:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC) strike iVote per sources found.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 09:58, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep. I see coverage
here,
here, its website has been saved by the Taminent Library at New York University
[2], and
here. A quick search produces these sources and it seems clear that a more thorough search would produce more. At the barest minimum, the content should be merged to
Revolutionary Socialist League (U.S.) and the page redirected. However, given the sourcing above, it seems clear that the article should be kept and improved.--
TM 00:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Your second source is from Proletarian Revolution, which is this organization’s magazine. That’s self-publication and doesn’t establish notability or significant, non-trivial coverage The other three don’t qualify as
significant, non-trivial coverage, and the last two aren’t even coverage at all. I would be supportive of a merge to Revolutionary Socialist League however. ToaNidhiki05 12:17, 30 April 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
Scott Burley (
talk) 02:48, 7 May 2019 (UTC)reply
Note to closing editor. There is consensus here, with all 4 editors who have come to the page agreeing to the proposed merge.10:12, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.