The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable individual. No sources can be found to expand upon the article other than a list of awards and nominations. That doesn't make a person notable.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk)
18:16, 17 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Where does it say that Porn Industry awards dont count? I would think any award such as
AVN Awards that has a wiki page should count. AVN Awards is the biggest Award in porn industry. Based on this she would meet WP:ANYBIO. I will gladly change my vote, if you can provide a policy that says otherwise.
Naomijeans (
talk)
21:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply
My understanding is that when
WP:PORNBIO was removed, it meant that awards no longer counted towards notability and coverage now needs to come from outside the industry. Here is the related discussion:
[1] Regards,
MrsSnoozyTurtle08:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Find something outside the awards to prove notability. And no, porn awards are not all notable. And how do you know this person is a woman? There is nothing online that states that. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk)
22:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete No sources have been provided in the article to establish notability. Non-notable porn awards and a directory listing do not count.
Zaathras (
talk)
00:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. This director fails
WP:FILMMAKER. Note: the article is outdated, and there was an AVN Hall of Fame induction in 2020. However, without independent reliable source coverage, this is yet another won-a-porn-award-but-the-sources-are-bad porn bio. Any claim to passing ANYBIO needs independent reliable sources that verify significance of the award. The consensus since 2019 is that, failing
WP:BASIC, porn awards don't indicate notability by themselves. An independent search for RS coverage yielded the usual porn trade churnalism.
• Gene93k (
talk)
00:39, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable individual. No sources can be found to expand upon the article other than a list of awards and nominations. That doesn't make a person notable.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk)
18:16, 17 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Where does it say that Porn Industry awards dont count? I would think any award such as
AVN Awards that has a wiki page should count. AVN Awards is the biggest Award in porn industry. Based on this she would meet WP:ANYBIO. I will gladly change my vote, if you can provide a policy that says otherwise.
Naomijeans (
talk)
21:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply
My understanding is that when
WP:PORNBIO was removed, it meant that awards no longer counted towards notability and coverage now needs to come from outside the industry. Here is the related discussion:
[1] Regards,
MrsSnoozyTurtle08:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Find something outside the awards to prove notability. And no, porn awards are not all notable. And how do you know this person is a woman? There is nothing online that states that. --
WikiCleanerMan (
talk)
22:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete No sources have been provided in the article to establish notability. Non-notable porn awards and a directory listing do not count.
Zaathras (
talk)
00:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. This director fails
WP:FILMMAKER. Note: the article is outdated, and there was an AVN Hall of Fame induction in 2020. However, without independent reliable source coverage, this is yet another won-a-porn-award-but-the-sources-are-bad porn bio. Any claim to passing ANYBIO needs independent reliable sources that verify significance of the award. The consensus since 2019 is that, failing
WP:BASIC, porn awards don't indicate notability by themselves. An independent search for RS coverage yielded the usual porn trade churnalism.
• Gene93k (
talk)
00:39, 24 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.