- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Captain Galaxy ( talk) 09:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Lauren W. Wilson
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lauren W. Wilson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Un-notable Resume, most references are about ColorComm, not Lauren herself, and notability is not inherited. dibbydib boop or snoop 05:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 05:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 05:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 05:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Lauren is extensively covered in highly notable sources and complies with WP:GNG. Kaley Willis ( talk) 11:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Pretty obvious the article meets GNG. The nomination claims the references are about ColorComm and not Wilson, but that's not accurate (the articles obviously talk about ColorComm, but that's because it would be journalistic oversight not to). (note: If the main issue about the article is supposed inherited notability, then it shouldn't be deleted - it should be moved to be a section of a page about ColorComm. which as of yet doesn't exist, but if the notability were truly inherited, it would/should) Samsmachado ( talk) 23:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Captain Galaxy ( talk) 09:24, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
Lauren W. Wilson
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lauren W. Wilson ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Un-notable Resume, most references are about ColorComm, not Lauren herself, and notability is not inherited. dibbydib boop or snoop 05:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 05:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 05:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 05:07, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Lauren is extensively covered in highly notable sources and complies with WP:GNG. Kaley Willis ( talk) 11:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - Pretty obvious the article meets GNG. The nomination claims the references are about ColorComm and not Wilson, but that's not accurate (the articles obviously talk about ColorComm, but that's because it would be journalistic oversight not to). (note: If the main issue about the article is supposed inherited notability, then it shouldn't be deleted - it should be moved to be a section of a page about ColorComm. which as of yet doesn't exist, but if the notability were truly inherited, it would/should) Samsmachado ( talk) 23:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.