From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Laura K. Ipsen

Laura K. Ipsen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am confident that Ipsen is a fine person and making a good contribution to digital tech, but this page runs counter to the goals articulated in Wikipedia:Notability (people). Does anyone have better sources to demonstrate more than that she is a competent executive in tech? I suspect that this article was posted while the Ellucian page was built, which page was deleted for covert advertising by MER-C. There is nothing cited that meets the criteria for notability. See WP:BIO and WP:NRVE -- Literarytech ( talk) 23:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 06:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 13:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 13:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 00:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Laura K. Ipsen

Laura K. Ipsen (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am confident that Ipsen is a fine person and making a good contribution to digital tech, but this page runs counter to the goals articulated in Wikipedia:Notability (people). Does anyone have better sources to demonstrate more than that she is a competent executive in tech? I suspect that this article was posted while the Ellucian page was built, which page was deleted for covert advertising by MER-C. There is nothing cited that meets the criteria for notability. See WP:BIO and WP:NRVE -- Literarytech ( talk) 23:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AllyD ( talk) 06:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 13:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 13:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem ( talk) 00:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook