The result was Delete. Eluchil404 ( talk) 06:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC) reply
This article fits the definition of "non-verifiable" to the letter, and in addition there already exist multiple several-year old templates that make note of this fact, yet nothing has changed. I should also add that the text of the article itself is questionable at points and seems to be rather inconsistent at others. The multiple-year-old major-problem templates, combined with the text of the article itself and the utter lack of references (and I tried to find some, just in case) make this article either the very first or the very second article that I've ever nominated for deletion, and I've been a wikiaddict for a long time. If I had to guess, I'd say this is the first time. I was enjoying myself reading about sterling engines and thinking about ways to make money off of firewood with the powergrid and came across this crappy article. Read it and form your own opinion and vote. Thanks. Spiral5800 ( talk) 12:43, 11 November 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 ( talk) 06:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC) reply
This article fits the definition of "non-verifiable" to the letter, and in addition there already exist multiple several-year old templates that make note of this fact, yet nothing has changed. I should also add that the text of the article itself is questionable at points and seems to be rather inconsistent at others. The multiple-year-old major-problem templates, combined with the text of the article itself and the utter lack of references (and I tried to find some, just in case) make this article either the very first or the very second article that I've ever nominated for deletion, and I've been a wikiaddict for a long time. If I had to guess, I'd say this is the first time. I was enjoying myself reading about sterling engines and thinking about ways to make money off of firewood with the powergrid and came across this crappy article. Read it and form your own opinion and vote. Thanks. Spiral5800 ( talk) 12:43, 11 November 2011 (UTC) reply