- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:10, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Lacey Rzeszowski ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
She lost the election (short by 2000 votes approximately). So her notability as a NJ lawmaker is not going to be there. No indication of future races or notability that way. So her positions, her campaign etc not worthy of note. Tomwsulcer ( talk) 22:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOL, zero notability outside politics. AusLondonder ( talk) 23:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. A person has to win the election and thereby hold office, not just run as a candidate, to clear WP:NPOL — but this makes no claim of preexisting notability for other reasons, and isn't referenced to anything like the depth or breadth of reliable source coverage it would take to deem her candidacy a special case like Christine O'Donnell's or Jon Ossoff's. Bearcat ( talk) 16:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Weak claim of notability as a losing political candidate. The sources in the article doen't meet the notability standard and nothing further found in a Google search. Alansohn ( talk) 03:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:10, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Lacey Rzeszowski ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
She lost the election (short by 2000 votes approximately). So her notability as a NJ lawmaker is not going to be there. No indication of future races or notability that way. So her positions, her campaign etc not worthy of note. Tomwsulcer ( talk) 22:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOL, zero notability outside politics. AusLondonder ( talk) 23:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. A person has to win the election and thereby hold office, not just run as a candidate, to clear WP:NPOL — but this makes no claim of preexisting notability for other reasons, and isn't referenced to anything like the depth or breadth of reliable source coverage it would take to deem her candidacy a special case like Christine O'Donnell's or Jon Ossoff's. Bearcat ( talk) 16:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Weak claim of notability as a losing political candidate. The sources in the article doen't meet the notability standard and nothing further found in a Google search. Alansohn ( talk) 03:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.