- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 17:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
LaFazia
- LaFazia ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a surname page, but there are no Wikipedia articles on notable people with this surname and it does not meet WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 16:32, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 02:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. AuthorAuthor ( talk) 17:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: m.o.p 20:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, m.o.p 20:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: m.o.p 20:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, m.o.p 20:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The lack of a list of notable people with this name can be dealt with by removing the set index template leaving us with an article telling us something about the provenance of the name but the Ancestry link is not good enough and I can’t find any significance coverage to show that the name meets WP:GNG. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Better references will appear as contributors add to the article. Let's give this some time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.16.103.65 ( talk) 23:18, 30 October 2017
- Delete Not sure what is the purpose of this article is. Subject is not notable at all. Huitzilopochtli1990 ( talk) 07:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 17:27, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
LaFazia
- LaFazia ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a surname page, but there are no Wikipedia articles on notable people with this surname and it does not meet WP:GNG. Boleyn ( talk) 16:32, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 02:18, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. AuthorAuthor ( talk) 17:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: m.o.p 20:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, m.o.p 20:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: m.o.p 20:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, m.o.p 20:28, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The lack of a list of notable people with this name can be dealt with by removing the set index template leaving us with an article telling us something about the provenance of the name but the Ancestry link is not good enough and I can’t find any significance coverage to show that the name meets WP:GNG. -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 12:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Better references will appear as contributors add to the article. Let's give this some time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.16.103.65 ( talk) 23:18, 30 October 2017
- Delete Not sure what is the purpose of this article is. Subject is not notable at all. Huitzilopochtli1990 ( talk) 07:42, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.