- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep as a technicality considering the nominator has now been uncovered as a [ past advertising user] and this subject is in fact notable (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 03:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
L.A.X (musician)
- L.A.X (musician) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article should be deleted. According to
WP:PAID. A strong believe that this Editors
Obari2Kay and
Oluwa2Chainz are on wikipedia to make money.
According to this statement . This users might be related.
Historical Ben (
talk) 12:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America 1000 02:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep the sources provided seem enough to pass WP:GNG. The comment cited doesn't show that there was someone writing for money (someone claimed they weren't and then without proof claimed that someone else was). There are some promotional issues that could use cleanup in terms of the words used in the article, but that's easily fixed in a manner other than deletion. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy Delete: @ TonyBallioni: This user Obari2Kay stated on my Talk Page that Oluwa2Chainz collected money to writes articles which i believe. The question is "How did he know Oluwa2Chainz?". Their must be a relationship between the two Editors as a freelancer. On Obari2Kay User page he wrote "Good bye" to his Co-worker which are the freelancer on wikipedia. I don"t trust this people.--Historical Ben ( talk) 18:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America 1000 02:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
They said that they were not a freelancer and paid, and then made a comment about the article creator getting paid as a freelancer. I'm going WP:AGF here and based on context think it was a young editor with a non-native grasp of English trying to defend themselves.Regardless of the paid vs. not-paid conversation, I think it meets WP:GNG and needs cleanup, not deletion. CSD G11 says that re-writing a notable article is preferable to deletion. There is enough here to scrape by GNG in my view, so we can fix it, not delete it. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:29, 19 October 2016 (UTC)- I just saw the previous SPI for the user, and based on the past, have stricken my comments here. I still think the coverage passes GNG, so I'm fine with keeping, however, and working on the articles to improve it. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note I don't know @ Oluwa2Chainz: but what I know is article written by any Wikipedia Editor and at the end of the article you find this "Authority control" and if you click on the link it takes you to the freelancer company..@ TonyBallioni: As you all know freelancer get paid. The only relationship I have with @ Oluwa2Chainz: is he keeps deleting my contributions on articles. Note:- I said "Bye Bye Editors & Freelancer" that does not make me one. I was a P.R & Publicist to Kiss FM 98.9 Lagos, I get paid well so why should I be waisting my time looking for someone to hire me, as you all know I use wiki as a par-time to get busy; check ever article created. I can creat today till 5 days, a week/2 or month before I created another due to am busy, but now am free and my article are been norminated for delete for no reason. On the "Authority control" it is written their "Musicbrainz" so read this [1]..-- Obari2Kay ( talk) 06:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This is a laughable afd thread because the criterion for deletion is quite invalid. Aside the poor grammar, @ Historical Ben: is a new user who has made less than 90 edits and yet made the bold move to nominate the subject for deletion before going ahead to request on this talk page that I get blocked. Some sort of conspiracy?. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 20:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 20:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —
Oluwa2Chainz »» (
talk to me) 20:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment this afd should be closed as the nominator has been blocked as a sock per this thread.— Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 21:45, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep as a technicality considering the nominator has now been uncovered as a [ past advertising user] and this subject is in fact notable (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 03:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
L.A.X (musician)
- L.A.X (musician) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article should be deleted. According to
WP:PAID. A strong believe that this Editors
Obari2Kay and
Oluwa2Chainz are on wikipedia to make money.
According to this statement . This users might be related.
Historical Ben (
talk) 12:16, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America 1000 02:51, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep the sources provided seem enough to pass WP:GNG. The comment cited doesn't show that there was someone writing for money (someone claimed they weren't and then without proof claimed that someone else was). There are some promotional issues that could use cleanup in terms of the words used in the article, but that's easily fixed in a manner other than deletion. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy Delete: @ TonyBallioni: This user Obari2Kay stated on my Talk Page that Oluwa2Chainz collected money to writes articles which i believe. The question is "How did he know Oluwa2Chainz?". Their must be a relationship between the two Editors as a freelancer. On Obari2Kay User page he wrote "Good bye" to his Co-worker which are the freelancer on wikipedia. I don"t trust this people.--Historical Ben ( talk) 18:09, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America 1000 02:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
They said that they were not a freelancer and paid, and then made a comment about the article creator getting paid as a freelancer. I'm going WP:AGF here and based on context think it was a young editor with a non-native grasp of English trying to defend themselves.Regardless of the paid vs. not-paid conversation, I think it meets WP:GNG and needs cleanup, not deletion. CSD G11 says that re-writing a notable article is preferable to deletion. There is enough here to scrape by GNG in my view, so we can fix it, not delete it. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:29, 19 October 2016 (UTC)- I just saw the previous SPI for the user, and based on the past, have stricken my comments here. I still think the coverage passes GNG, so I'm fine with keeping, however, and working on the articles to improve it. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note I don't know @ Oluwa2Chainz: but what I know is article written by any Wikipedia Editor and at the end of the article you find this "Authority control" and if you click on the link it takes you to the freelancer company..@ TonyBallioni: As you all know freelancer get paid. The only relationship I have with @ Oluwa2Chainz: is he keeps deleting my contributions on articles. Note:- I said "Bye Bye Editors & Freelancer" that does not make me one. I was a P.R & Publicist to Kiss FM 98.9 Lagos, I get paid well so why should I be waisting my time looking for someone to hire me, as you all know I use wiki as a par-time to get busy; check ever article created. I can creat today till 5 days, a week/2 or month before I created another due to am busy, but now am free and my article are been norminated for delete for no reason. On the "Authority control" it is written their "Musicbrainz" so read this [1]..-- Obari2Kay ( talk) 06:12, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep This is a laughable afd thread because the criterion for deletion is quite invalid. Aside the poor grammar, @ Historical Ben: is a new user who has made less than 90 edits and yet made the bold move to nominate the subject for deletion before going ahead to request on this talk page that I get blocked. Some sort of conspiracy?. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 20:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 20:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —
Oluwa2Chainz »» (
talk to me) 20:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Comment this afd should be closed as the nominator has been blocked as a sock per this thread.— Oluwa2Chainz »» ( talk to me) 21:45, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.