- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:55, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Kyohei Wada ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG, as there is no significant coverage in independent sources. Please note that professional wrestlers and professional wrestling referees are covered by the notability guideline at WP:ENTERTAINER, which he does not meet. The only sources are WP:ROUTINE results at a wrestling database with no criteria for inclusion. Nikki♥ 311 23:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥ 311 23:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥ 311 23:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - meets
WP:GNG. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
59.101.80.159 (
talk)
09:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Please elaborate. Nikki♥ 311 19:40, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - does not meet WP:GNG per the nominator. Referees in wrestling are rarely notable when they are not involved in storylines as the likes of Earl Hebner, Charles Robinson and Mike Chioda have been. Lack of coverage shows that Wada has not been involved in that way. 101.182.45.178 ( talk) 10:59, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 05:07, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 19:55, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
- Kyohei Wada ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG, as there is no significant coverage in independent sources. Please note that professional wrestlers and professional wrestling referees are covered by the notability guideline at WP:ENTERTAINER, which he does not meet. The only sources are WP:ROUTINE results at a wrestling database with no criteria for inclusion. Nikki♥ 311 23:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥ 311 23:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥ 311 23:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - meets
WP:GNG. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
59.101.80.159 (
talk)
09:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Please elaborate. Nikki♥ 311 19:40, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - does not meet WP:GNG per the nominator. Referees in wrestling are rarely notable when they are not involved in storylines as the likes of Earl Hebner, Charles Robinson and Mike Chioda have been. Lack of coverage shows that Wada has not been involved in that way. 101.182.45.178 ( talk) 10:59, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 05:07, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.