The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep There are a good number of sources. There are decent sources like
this, which are supported with other sources that are more routine in nature, but such sources are allowed to support and add. While I agree that there are way too many permastubs on wikipedia, I would say when there is a large quantity of sourcing regarding a player to write a decent article covering many different events, it adds up to being acceptable enough for an article.
RedPatch (
talk)
22:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. The only source presented here or is in the article is
this and it alone is not enough for the subject to pass GNG. I found no SIGCOV during a Google search and none on
Newspapers.com.
Alvaldi (
talk)
19:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. The one source mentioned above is essentially a press release (schools/proud parents send these out to local newspapers all the time) in local media, it's highly unlikely any of it is independent analysis by the author.
JoelleJay (
talk)
19:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Like many editors here I agree there's insufficient coverage here. Plenty of quantity. Nothing of quality. Everything applied is routine sports news as correctly assessed by User:JoelleJay. This is a BLP. We need direct detailing of the person, not merely the jersey number.
BusterD (
talk)
09:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep There are a good number of sources. There are decent sources like
this, which are supported with other sources that are more routine in nature, but such sources are allowed to support and add. While I agree that there are way too many permastubs on wikipedia, I would say when there is a large quantity of sourcing regarding a player to write a decent article covering many different events, it adds up to being acceptable enough for an article.
RedPatch (
talk)
22:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. The only source presented here or is in the article is
this and it alone is not enough for the subject to pass GNG. I found no SIGCOV during a Google search and none on
Newspapers.com.
Alvaldi (
talk)
19:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. The one source mentioned above is essentially a press release (schools/proud parents send these out to local newspapers all the time) in local media, it's highly unlikely any of it is independent analysis by the author.
JoelleJay (
talk)
19:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Like many editors here I agree there's insufficient coverage here. Plenty of quantity. Nothing of quality. Everything applied is routine sports news as correctly assessed by User:JoelleJay. This is a BLP. We need direct detailing of the person, not merely the jersey number.
BusterD (
talk)
09:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.