From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I read the consensus of editors here that this article should be Kept. Liz Read! Talk! 04:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Kukaracha (film)

Kukaracha (film) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod contested, more sources added since Prod, but all of them are trivial. Still seeing no SIGCOV, zero passable sources, see source analysis. WP:GNG and WP:NFILM fail

Source Significant? Independent? Reliable? Secondary? Pass/Fail Notes
Literary Portal Red XN Green tickY Question? Question? Red XN A short plot summary of the movie and a passing mention that it is faithful to the book. Literature database that feels more tertiary than secondary
The Current Digest of the Soviet Press Red XN Green tickY Green tickY Green tickY Red XN A single sentence stating the story is "appealing"
Georgian Journal Red XN Green tickY Green tickY Green tickY Red XN A listicle of "The best-looking Georgian actors of all time" passing mention of the actors being in the film
Obituary Red XN Red XN Red XN Green tickY Red XN An obituary for an actress in the film, again a single passing mention of her being in the film
Los Angeles Times Red XN Green tickY Green tickY Green tickY Red XN Certainly in depth of the actor it is a piece on, but again, a single, trivial mention of the film
Historical dictionary of Georgia Red XN Green tickY Green tickY Red XN Red XN Trivial mentions in a tertiary source, passing mentions as acting credits
Total qualifying sources 0
There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements
IceBergYYC ( talk) 13:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC) reply

-- A. B. ( talkcontribsglobal count) 14:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 19:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. As an older film not in English language, not even using Latin or Cyrillic alphabet, this meets WP:NFO.3 by winning one of the most important film awards in the Soviet Union. The importance of the award can be established, eg by this Taylor & Francis book [1]. Apparently important enough that post-Soviet Union it's been replaced by 3: Kinotavr, Kinoshock, and Vivat, Kino Rossii. Note also that this film received the award prior to the establishment of the Nika Award. — siro χ o 05:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC) reply
Keep - meets major award test WilsonP NYC ( talk) 22:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I read the consensus of editors here that this article should be Kept. Liz Read! Talk! 04:37, 12 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Kukaracha (film)

Kukaracha (film) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod contested, more sources added since Prod, but all of them are trivial. Still seeing no SIGCOV, zero passable sources, see source analysis. WP:GNG and WP:NFILM fail

Source Significant? Independent? Reliable? Secondary? Pass/Fail Notes
Literary Portal Red XN Green tickY Question? Question? Red XN A short plot summary of the movie and a passing mention that it is faithful to the book. Literature database that feels more tertiary than secondary
The Current Digest of the Soviet Press Red XN Green tickY Green tickY Green tickY Red XN A single sentence stating the story is "appealing"
Georgian Journal Red XN Green tickY Green tickY Green tickY Red XN A listicle of "The best-looking Georgian actors of all time" passing mention of the actors being in the film
Obituary Red XN Red XN Red XN Green tickY Red XN An obituary for an actress in the film, again a single passing mention of her being in the film
Los Angeles Times Red XN Green tickY Green tickY Green tickY Red XN Certainly in depth of the actor it is a piece on, but again, a single, trivial mention of the film
Historical dictionary of Georgia Red XN Green tickY Green tickY Red XN Red XN Trivial mentions in a tertiary source, passing mentions as acting credits
Total qualifying sources 0
There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements
IceBergYYC ( talk) 13:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:06, 1 September 2023 (UTC) reply

-- A. B. ( talkcontribsglobal count) 14:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 19:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Keep. As an older film not in English language, not even using Latin or Cyrillic alphabet, this meets WP:NFO.3 by winning one of the most important film awards in the Soviet Union. The importance of the award can be established, eg by this Taylor & Francis book [1]. Apparently important enough that post-Soviet Union it's been replaced by 3: Kinotavr, Kinoshock, and Vivat, Kino Rossii. Note also that this film received the award prior to the establishment of the Nika Award. — siro χ o 05:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC) reply
Keep - meets major award test WilsonP NYC ( talk) 22:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook