The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
WP:SOFTDELETE. No verdict on whether or not this is a hoax; if somebody wishes this userified, feel free to ping me.
The BushrangerOne ping only 21:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - As per nominator, many inconsistencies and lack of references and sources on the topic. The topic itself is hardly found in a google search, therefore the hoax/original research tags. Simple facts are not sourced and the article overall does not seem to be neutral.--
Blackknight12 (
talk) 13:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete as hoax, of Move to draft to give time to clarify the hoax/not hoax nature.
Stuartyeates (
talk) 11:10, 12 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment. Looking at the available sources on Google, I am convinced that this is not a hoax, and that there was someone known as Korran who was a leader in, and probably the effective ruler of, Kudiramalai nearly 2,000 years ago. However, I am not satisfied that all the references in this article necessarily relate to that person: I think that there is a serious possibility of
synthesis.
PWilkinson (
talk) 16:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)reply
There seems to be a pattern of
synthesis with this user. The same issues relate to
Kudiramalai and did with
Annius Plocamus. It is possible that various facts in the article are true however there are many reference and verification issues, not to mention the distortion and manipulation of information.--
Blackknight12 (
talk) 07:21, 15 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Randykitty (
talk) 14:00, 18 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment -- I have no idea, but am suspicious: the sources include "Tamils 800 years ago"= 1000AD, but the text refers to Romans = 1st to 4th centuries AD; and Phoenicians = several centuries earlier.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 23:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
WP:SOFTDELETE. No verdict on whether or not this is a hoax; if somebody wishes this userified, feel free to ping me.
The BushrangerOne ping only 21:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - As per nominator, many inconsistencies and lack of references and sources on the topic. The topic itself is hardly found in a google search, therefore the hoax/original research tags. Simple facts are not sourced and the article overall does not seem to be neutral.--
Blackknight12 (
talk) 13:47, 3 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete as hoax, of Move to draft to give time to clarify the hoax/not hoax nature.
Stuartyeates (
talk) 11:10, 12 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment. Looking at the available sources on Google, I am convinced that this is not a hoax, and that there was someone known as Korran who was a leader in, and probably the effective ruler of, Kudiramalai nearly 2,000 years ago. However, I am not satisfied that all the references in this article necessarily relate to that person: I think that there is a serious possibility of
synthesis.
PWilkinson (
talk) 16:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)reply
There seems to be a pattern of
synthesis with this user. The same issues relate to
Kudiramalai and did with
Annius Plocamus. It is possible that various facts in the article are true however there are many reference and verification issues, not to mention the distortion and manipulation of information.--
Blackknight12 (
talk) 07:21, 15 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Randykitty (
talk) 14:00, 18 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment -- I have no idea, but am suspicious: the sources include "Tamils 800 years ago"= 1000AD, but the text refers to Romans = 1st to 4th centuries AD; and Phoenicians = several centuries earlier.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 23:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.