- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Editors are encouraged to make improvements to the article, including the addition of sources indicated here, to prevent renomination in the near future. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 14:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Konsento ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article about a 2001 film, sourced only to IMDb (which is not WP:RS) since creation in 2006. Searching in Japanese isn't easy; but googling "コンセント 2001" turned up these results, none of which looks like independent in-depth coverage when translated by Google. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert ( talk) 13:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Japan. Shellwood ( talk) 13:18, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Reviews at Variety [1] and Midnight Eye [2] DonaldD23 talk to me 14:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per above sources. I'll try to expand the article, but if I don't, I'd appreciate of others helped out. Toadspike ( talk) 15:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per above sources, article passes WP:NFILM, but it needs to be expanded. Brian O'Conner 07:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, it's a big film, just because the only source now is IMDB doesn't mean there aren't more sources out there as pointed out above. Fulmard ( talk) 18:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Editors are encouraged to make improvements to the article, including the addition of sources indicated here, to prevent renomination in the near future. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 ( ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 14:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Konsento ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article about a 2001 film, sourced only to IMDb (which is not WP:RS) since creation in 2006. Searching in Japanese isn't easy; but googling "コンセント 2001" turned up these results, none of which looks like independent in-depth coverage when translated by Google. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert ( talk) 13:03, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Japan. Shellwood ( talk) 13:18, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Reviews at Variety [1] and Midnight Eye [2] DonaldD23 talk to me 14:01, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per above sources. I'll try to expand the article, but if I don't, I'd appreciate of others helped out. Toadspike ( talk) 15:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per above sources, article passes WP:NFILM, but it needs to be expanded. Brian O'Conner 07:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, it's a big film, just because the only source now is IMDB doesn't mean there aren't more sources out there as pointed out above. Fulmard ( talk) 18:32, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.